← Search

Patricia Kladis-Schiappa

Burr Ridge, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 105W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Patricia Kladis-Schiappa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
L
2026-07-13 · NITA S 35W40 Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Maderia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
Nopp Kositt / Colleen Roberts
2026-06-29 · NITA S 35W40 Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Maderia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · NITA S 35W40 Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karin Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-05 · NITA S 35W40 Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Maderia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-17 · NITA E 35W40c Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Maderia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
Christine Lee / Jessica Arnold
2025-09-05 · NITA E 35W40c Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Genie Prokaski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-15 · NITA S 35W40g Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lara Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-11 · NITA S 35W40g Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Shishman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-07-07 · NITA S 35W40g Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lara Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-06-23 · NITA S 35W40g Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Simona Fojtikova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-18 · NITA S 35W40g Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Simona Fojtikova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-06-16 · NITA S 35W40g Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Genie Prokaski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 59.5% of games
3.5
56.4%
44W–34L · 52.9% of games
6.5
83.3%
30W–6L · 62.7% of games
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 64.8% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer