Teams

SPierle (Weddington)

2024 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 7.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-29vs LSelland/EJohnston (Sardis)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesPatti Moser / Suzy Sandbo vs Janine Rust / Anne Sadler2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSara Applegate / Nancy Klug vs Renee Broud / Elizabeth Johnston6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Foster / Tamara Gallagher vs Daniela Pagano / Lynn Selland1-6, 4-6
2024-09-24vs LSelland/EJohnston (Sardis)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJanet Garvey / Kelley Montroy vs Dawn Castain / Colleen Priest2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKaren Foster / Nancy Klug vs Janine Rust / Anne Sadler3-6, 3-6
2024-09-10vs LSelland/EJohnston (Sardis)Won 21
L#1 DoublesAMY SAFIR / Cheri King vs Sharon Wooten / Dawn Castain1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSuzy Sandbo / Janet Garvey vs Lynn Selland / Joyce Crowley3-1
W#3 DoublesSara Applegate / Michele Ovendorf vs Renee Broud / Daniela Pagano2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-03vs LSelland/EJohnston (Sardis)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSara Applegate / Cyndie Hobson vs Dawn Castain / Sharon Wooten6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Ovendorf / Shannon Pierle vs Deborah Russo / Joni Smith6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNily Willis / Kelley Montroy vs Elizabeth Johnston / Renee Broud2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-08-27vs LSelland/EJohnston (Sardis)Won 20
W#1 DoublesTamara Gallagher / Nily Willis vs Lydia Schoeck / Daniela Pagano0-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Applegate / Nancy Klug vs Lynn Selland / Colleen Priest6-4, 6-2
2024-08-20vs LSelland/EJohnston (Sardis)Won 30
W#1 DoublesCheri King / Michele Ovendorf vs Janine Rust / Laura Bowers6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesShannon Pierle / AMY SAFIR vs Sheryl Beaver / Dawn Castain6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSuzy Sandbo / Patti Moser vs Joni Smith / Anne Sadler6-3, 6-4
2024-08-13vs LSelland/EJohnston (Sardis)Won 30
W#1 DoublesSara Applegate / Cyndie Hobson vs Elizabeth Johnston / Dawn Castain6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCheri King / Kelley Montroy vs Janine Rust / Laura Bowers7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTamara Gallagher / Janet Garvey vs Lynn Selland / Daniela Pagano6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Cheri King
published 4
3.82
Nily Willis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Sara Applegate
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Shannon Pierle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Janet Garvey
published
3.48
Tamara Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.47
AMY SAFIR
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Suzy Sandbo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Michele Ovendorf
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Kelley Montroy
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.43
Patti Moser
published
3.37
Cyndie Hobson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Nancy Klug
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Catherine Rousseaux
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Rousseaux + Michele Ovendorf5068% games+19.2% vs expected
Nancy Klug + Cyndie Hobson8261% games+11.8% vs expected
Cyndie Hobson + Tamara Gallagher13559% games+7.3% vs expected
Cyndie Hobson + Sara Applegate7262% games+3.6% vs expected
Cheri King + AMY SAFIR8259% games+3.3% vs expected
AMY SAFIR + Tamara Gallagher5649% games+2.9% vs expected
Suzy Sandbo + Tamara Gallagher8853% games+2.0% vs expected
Nancy Klug + AMY SAFIR211455% games+2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheri King
85W–52L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Nily Willis
100W–79L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Sara Applegate
91W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Shannon Pierle
208W–77L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Janet Garvey
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Tamara Gallagher
248W–148L career · type A · 7 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
AMY SAFIR
191W–93L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Suzy Sandbo
78W–76L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.46
3.5
Michele Ovendorf
154W–100L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Kelley Montroy
138W–99L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%67%32%
3.44
Patti Moser
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.43
3.5
Cyndie Hobson
220W–123L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Nancy Klug
148W–104L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Catherine Rousseaux
37W–27L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.