Teams

CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Northbrook Lloyd Thurs 7 $24

CDTA Summer Adult 55 & Over WN · WE

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesSara Marberry / Silvia Kusaka vs Marilyn Tansey / Lisa Korte6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaury Scheyer / Kathleen McLaughlin vs Audrey Geannopoulos / Michelle Reynolds6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDiane McKillen / Carlene Motto vs Irene Powers / Joanne Rajchel6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen McLaughlin / Kelly O'Donnell vs Lisa Bierman / Judy Weik6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKelly O'Donnell / Laurie Gray vs Nancy Manolis / Kate Newman5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Marberry / Silvia Kusaka vs Huan Chang / Sheila Bondoc2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly O'Donnell / Martha Lloyd vs Patricia Jablonski / April Cafmeyer3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Gray / Mary Etherington vs Mary Pat McGeehan / Gail Harowski2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGayle Dominicis / Sara Marberry vs Zagorka James / Kristin Lueken6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMary Etherington / Kathleen McLaughlin vs Teri Ayotte / Janice McKane6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Northbrook Lloyd Thurs 7 $246117413154
2CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Park Forest Harowski Mon 7 $155216513133
3CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Heritage Eisner Wed 7 $215212920175
4CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Tam Corey Mon 7 $2243101125194
5CDTA S 55&O 8.0W MT Bann (Out) Greeley Thurs 6:30 $2534101126193
6CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Wheaton (Out) Tansey Tues 6:30 $173491227203
7CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Centre Court Rajchel Mon 7 $202571430185
8CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Oak Park TC (Out) Roberts Sun 2 $120731838243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Hoda Elshakankery
published 4.5
3.87
Silvia Kusaka
published 4
3.75
Kimberly Ricchio
published 4
3.69
Gayle Dominicis
published 4
3.68
Mary Etherington
published 4
3.68
Debra Brambora
published 4
3.67
Carlene Motto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Laurie Gray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Cheryl Watkins
published 4
3.59
Martha Lloyd
published 4
3.51
Diane McKillen
published 4
3.46
Laury Scheyer
published 4
3.22
Mimi Paffrath
published 3.5
Kathleen McLaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kelly O'Donnell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sara Marberry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Brambora + Hoda Elshakankery24467% games+9.3% vs expected
Sara Marberry + Silvia Kusaka9459% games+8.4% vs expected
Mary Etherington + Gayle Dominicis14362% games+5.0% vs expected
Hoda Elshakankery + Gayle Dominicis632059% games+2.4% vs expected
Kimberly Ricchio + Hoda Elshakankery8653% games+2.3% vs expected
Kimberly Ricchio + Gayle Dominicis6455% games+1.8% vs expected
Hoda Elshakankery + Laurie Gray331260% games+1.8% vs expected
Martha Lloyd + Hoda Elshakankery13457% games+1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hoda Elshakankery
216W–111L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.16
4
Silvia Kusaka
232W–160L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Kimberly Ricchio
88W–60L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Gayle Dominicis
229W–135L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Mary Etherington
110W–66L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Debra Brambora
180W–106L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Carlene Motto
131W–124L career · 1 line in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.67
Laurie Gray
162W–113L career · 2 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Cheryl Watkins
72W–57L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Martha Lloyd
216W–148L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Diane McKillen
89W–54L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Laury Scheyer
56W–44L career · type A · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Mimi Paffrath
76W–51L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Kathleen McLaughlin
29W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly O'Donnell
71W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Marberry
124W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.