Teams

CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Tam Corey Mon 7 $22

CDTA Summer Adult 55 & Over WN · WE

14 players · average NTRP 3.86 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesJulie Weidner / Maria Lobo-Corey vs Raquel Karpinski / Donna Matkovic0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJill Siegel / Ali Gerstad vs Irene Powers / Nancy Maska4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Manolis / Laura Purcell vs Ann Wiet / Joanne Rajchel6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesPatricia Nick / Jill Siegel vs Beth Immen / Terra Jahns3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJulie Colhoun / Kate Newman vs Conni Stinek / Erica Eisner7-6, 1-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLing Arenson / Gail Wilson vs Jan MacK / Zagorka James6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMaria Lobo-Corey / Julie Weidner vs Gayle Dominicis / Hoda Elshakankery3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNancy Manolis / Kate Newman vs Kelly O'Donnell / Laurie Gray7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNoreen Ohcana / Gail Wilson vs Mimi Paffrath / Martha Lloyd6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMaria Lobo-Corey / Julie Weidner vs Julie Sujack / Maura Binecki7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Colhoun / Kate Newman vs Sue Rhomberg / Lisa Bierman7-6, 3-1
W#3 DoublesPatricia Nick / Gail Wilson vs Shirley Moore / Colleen Roberts6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Purcell / Nancy Manolis vs Audrey Geannopoulos / Joan Labue6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNoreen Ohcana / Gail Wilson vs Tracy MacKh / Mary Ellen Young6-2, 5-1
W#1 DoublesPatricia Nick / Jill Siegel vs Julie Alexander / Pam Fisher6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulie Colhoun / Angela Hanson vs Kristine Blaser / Christina Greeley5-7, 4-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Northbrook Lloyd Thurs 7 $246117413154
2CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Park Forest Harowski Mon 7 $155216513133
3CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Heritage Eisner Wed 7 $215212920175
4CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Tam Corey Mon 7 $2243101125194
5CDTA S 55&O 8.0W MT Bann (Out) Greeley Thurs 6:30 $2534101126193
6CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Wheaton (Out) Tansey Tues 6:30 $173491227203
7CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Centre Court Rajchel Mon 7 $202571430185
8CDTA S 55&O 8.0W Oak Park TC (Out) Roberts Sun 2 $120731838243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Jill Siegel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gail Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Laura Purcell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Kate Newman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Ling Arenson
published 4
3.61
Julie Weidner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Nancy Manolis
published 4
3.55
Angela Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Ali Gerstad
published 4
3.47
Maria Lobo-Corey
published 3.5
3.43
Noreen Ohcana
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Paula McKendry
published 3.5
Julie Colhoun
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Nick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Lobo-Corey + Jill Siegel4366% games+11.8% vs expected
Ling Arenson + Julie Weidner12851% games+8.8% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Nancy Manolis10360% games+4.1% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Julie Weidner203349% games+2.3% vs expected
Julie Weidner + Angela Hanson6951% games+2.2% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Angela Hanson111449% games−0.2% vs expected
Noreen Ohcana + Ali Gerstad3253% games−1.3% vs expected
Ling Arenson + Angela Hanson8551% games−6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Siegel
84W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Gail Wilson
25W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Purcell
158W–161L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Kate Newman
44W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Ling Arenson
54W–44L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Julie Weidner
167W–156L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Nancy Manolis
114W–130L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56
4
Angela Hanson
119W–137L career · 1 line in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Ali Gerstad
123W–151L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Maria Lobo-Corey
276W–244L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
Noreen Ohcana
66W–95L career · 2 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.43
3.5
Paula McKendry
88W–95L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Julie Colhoun
36W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Nick
46W–77L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.