Teams

Boomshakalaka 18+

2025 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.55 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Shot Show 18s81351030331
2PTSA 4.072311436334
3Tenniscity 1872281744390
4Net Results63311431309
5OverServed18+54192657425
6Net Chix 1836202557418
7Boomshakalaka 18+18113474498

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Stacia Albiston
published 3.5
3.48
Erin Perry
published 4
3.47
Stacey Walker
published 3.5
3.37
Tiffany Roberts
published 3.5
3.30
Lori Ewing
published 3.5
3.28
Jean Nielsen
published 3.5
3.26
Kiley Holt
published 3.5
3.23
Cassie Ewing
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.22
Kelly Loeb
published
3.19
Patty Jackson
published 3.5
3.17
Paige Brown
published 3.5
3.15
Rachel Boren
published 3.5
Melanie Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Wendy Klein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacia Albiston + Tiffany Roberts12854% games+1.3% vs expected
Cassie Ewing + Paige Brown61050% games−3.5% vs expected
Lori Ewing + Cassie Ewing185242% games−8.6% vs expected
Melanie Mitchell + Lori Ewing162044% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Mitchell + Kelly Loeb102240% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Klein + Erin Perry4647% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Mitchell + Patty Jackson0628% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Mitchell + Paige Brown2443% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stacia Albiston
59W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
4
Erin Perry
68W–102L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Stacey Walker
72W–53L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Tiffany Roberts
59W–43L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Lori Ewing
92W–137L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Jean Nielsen
48W–29L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Kiley Holt
43W–65L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Cassie Ewing
28W–52L career · 11 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kelly Loeb
91W–100L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Patty Jackson
93W–84L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Paige Brown
83W–64L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Rachel Boren
146W–192L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Melanie Mitchell
44W–61L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Klein
8W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.