Teams

SFV LLW - Absolutely Smashing 55+ Allison MacEwan

2024 Adult 55+ SFV Spring · SFV 55 & Over - Women 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesMargie Englis / Christine Chu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-03vs SFV - Racketeers 55+Won 10
W#1 DoublesDeidre Hope / Margie Englis vs Yvonne Brooks / Diana Costa6-0, 6-0
2024-07-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesKimberlin Morley / Margie Englis vs Diana Costa / Kathleen Johnson6-2, 6-0
2024-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Culhane / Margie Englis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 55 & Over - Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Margie Englis
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.81
Christine Chu
published 3
2.79
Deidre Hope
published 3
2.72
Kimberlin Morley
published
2.65
Molly Jackson
published
2.65
Ameline Suson
published 3
2.63
Allison Mac Ewan
published 3
2.60
Vanessa Nelson
published
Holly Culhane
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Margie Englis
169W–111L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
3
Christine Chu
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Deidre Hope
20W–18L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Kimberlin Morley
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Molly Jackson
14W–16L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Ameline Suson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Allison Mac Ewan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Vanessa Nelson
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
Holly Culhane
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.