Teams

Black-40’s 3.5-4.5

2026 Tri-Level Doubles 40&Over · Women 3.5, 4.0, 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.10 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Delaina Lucus
published 4.5
4.00
Dee Dee Griffith
published 4.5
3.60
Courtney Gianola
published 4
3.49
Shaye Caldwell
published
3.47
Tina Boykin
published
3.47
Danielle Black
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Heather Flathau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Barbara Holcomb
published 3.5
3.29
Hope Andy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Robin Hudson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Wendi Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Maya Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendi Johnson + Barbara Holcomb3261% gamesnot enough data
Tina Boykin + Courtney Gianola4162% gamesnot enough data
Tina Boykin + Danielle Black404 matchesnot enough data
Robin Hudson + Barbara Holcomb303 matchesnot enough data
Robin Hudson + Tina Boykin033 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Holcomb + Tina Boykin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Delaina Lucus
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Dee Dee Griffith
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
4.00
4
Courtney Gianola
26W–12L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Shaye Caldwell
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Tina Boykin
65W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
4
Danielle Black
40W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
Heather Flathau
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
3.5
Barbara Holcomb
57W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
Hope Andy
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.29
Robin Hudson
38W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
Wendi Johnson
23W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Maya Stewart
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.