Teams

Augustine 3.5W Fall Singles Fri AM

2026 Piedmont GRETA Fall Singles · 3.5 W Fall Singles

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#2 SinglesKelen Walker vs Cheryl Scott6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesCassidy MacKay vs Ginger Ballard6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKelen Walker vs Caitlin Brooks6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRebecca Sheppard vs Mary Carol Swajkoski Adams3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesCassidy MacKay vs Ella Simpson3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLondon Kern vs Katelyn Chapman3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJeanie Reynolds vs Debbie Johnson6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMelissa Baker vs Jennifer Klein5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRebecca Sheppard vs Shatana Knight7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 W Fall Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ballard/Cockman 3.5W Fall Singles Fri AM2051326
2Gonzalez-Flores 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM1021218
3Dagger/Wilson 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM1021224
4Augustine 3.5W Fall Singles Fri AM1142543
5Goodman/Jones 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM0224861
6Starr/Alamance CC 3.5W Fall Singles Fri AM02061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Melissa Baker
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.47
Kate Augustine
published
3.32
Kelen Walker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.19
Jeanie Reynolds
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Rebecca Sheppard
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.13
London Kern
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.01
Misty Hilliard
published
2.97
Cassidy MacKay
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelen Walker + Misty Hilliard2348% games−3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Baker
37W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Kate Augustine
44W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Kelen Walker
33W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
Jeanie Reynolds
38W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
Rebecca Sheppard
55W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.19
London Kern
13W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
Misty Hilliard
34W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Cassidy MacKay
26W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.