Teams

Dagger/Wilson 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM

2026 Piedmont GRETA Fall Singles · 3.5 W Fall Singles

6 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 14 7:30 PM
J Spencer Love Tennis Center
Sep 21 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Courtney DaggerEmily Wilson
Sep 28 6:00 PM
J Spencer Love Tennis Center
Oct 5 6:00 PM
Oak Hollow Tennis Center
Oct 12 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Courtney DaggerEmily Wilson
Oct 19 6:00 PM
J Spencer Love Tennis Center
Oct 26 6:00 PM
J Spencer Love Tennis Center
W#1 SinglesCaroline Stowers vs Kari Eddington6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAshlyn Wilson vs Pam Fabros-Beuchat6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesSamantha Price vs Emily Mack0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAshlyn Wilson vs Thais Warwar6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesCaroline Stowers vs Courtney Jones6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesEmily Wilson vs Kathy Falls3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 W Fall Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ballard/Cockman 3.5W Fall Singles Fri AM2051326
2Gonzalez-Flores 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM1021218
3Dagger/Wilson 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM1021224
4Augustine 3.5W Fall Singles Fri AM1142543
5Goodman/Jones 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM0224861
6Starr/Alamance CC 3.5W Fall Singles Fri AM02061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Caroline Stowers
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Britt Flanagan
published 3.5
3.26
Ashlyn Wilson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Samantha Price
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Emily Wilson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.96
Courtney Dagger
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Dagger + Ashlyn Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Stowers
23W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Britt Flanagan
13W–9L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Ashlyn Wilson
20W–15L career · type D · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
Samantha Price
22W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
9%89%1%
3.19
Emily Wilson
178W–123L career · 1 line in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Courtney Dagger
37W–29L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.