Teams

CDTA S 55&OW7.0 6.STP Lauterbach Sun 1 $22

1Summer 55&O WN · WE

20 players · average NTRP 3.44 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesAudene Gordon / Paulette Jenne vs Catherine Battin / Mary Gutowski-Hazzard6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLara Phillips / Lynn Callahan vs Denise Schneider / Christine Kupfer4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMika Nomura / Julie Pawula vs Megan Crisham / Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt5-7, 0-2
2026-08-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMargo Carvell / Sandra Villa vs Christina Greeley / Cheryl Ingram3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSally Ann Martin / Rita Williams vs Elizabeth Cassier / Heather Welch3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesPeggy Schwerman / Sally Ann Martin vs Susan Kalina / Jody Sternberg0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7 $2210227925244
2CDTA S 55&OW7.0 7.RCLB Eichner Tue 7 $22102231330284
3CDTA S 55&OW7.0 2.NTC Stalcup Thu 7 $2465201330249
4CDTA S 55&OW7.0 1.Wilm Ellison Sun 1 $2556151839307
5CDTA S 55&OW7.0 6.STP Lauterbach Sun 1 $2256161744309
6CDTA S 55&OW7.0 4.Tam Grabow Mon 7 $2247141941293
7CDTA S 55&OW7.0 3.Gnbk Edidin Mon 7 $3001253167408

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Lara Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Margo Carvell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.63
Paulette Jenne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Erin Wyatt
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.58
Mya Murata
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Mitzi Kastner
published 3.5
3.28
Deborah Sonoda
published 3.5
3.17
Julie Pawula
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Mika Nomura
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Sandra Villa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Diana Morgan
published 3.5
3.10
Mishez Avari
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
3.01
Ryoko Howell
published 3.5
2.92
Audene Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Tina Schauls
published 3
2.77
Peggy Schwerman
published 3
2.59
Lynn Callahan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Rita Williams
published
Sally Ann Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Callahan + Ryoko Howell5648% games+1.7% vs expected
Lara Phillips + Erin Wyatt213050% games−1.6% vs expected
Margo Carvell + Sandra Villa6750% games−1.9% vs expected
Lynn Callahan + Mya Murata6648% games−3.4% vs expected
Ryoko Howell + Cecilia Lauterbach12758% games−3.6% vs expected
Lynn Callahan + Lara Phillips4452% games−6.8% vs expected
Peggy Schwerman + Julie Pawula121549% gamesnot enough data
Audene Gordon + Julie Pawula101348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lara Phillips
98W–91L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.76
3.5
Margo Carvell
138W–93L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
4
Paulette Jenne
58W–49L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.63
Erin Wyatt
44W–75L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Mya Murata
95W–100L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Mitzi Kastner
57W–47L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Deborah Sonoda
22W–30L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Julie Pawula
73W–120L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Mika Nomura
66W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Sandra Villa
84W–79L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Diana Morgan
97W–43L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Mishez Avari
53W–87L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Cecilia Lauterbach
83W–87L career · no lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
3.5
Ryoko Howell
82W–76L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Audene Gordon
69W–72L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%27%
2.92
3
Tina Schauls
70W–83L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Peggy Schwerman
123W–136L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Lynn Callahan
34W–108L career · 1 line in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
Rita Williams
27W–28L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sally Ann Martin
28W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.