Teams

CDTA S 55&OW7.0 4.Tam Grabow Mon 7 $22

1Summer 55&O WN · WE

21 players · average NTRP 3.47 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesCatherine Battin / Mary Gutowski-Hazzard vs Audene Gordon / Paulette Jenne7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDenise Schneider / Christine Kupfer vs Lara Phillips / Lynn Callahan6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMegan Crisham / Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt vs Mika Nomura / Julie Pawula7-5, 2-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Kupfer / Mandy Shaw vs Dawn Kenny / Laura Knapp6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMegan Crisham / Mary Neuhaus vs Katherine Moll / Anne Ryan1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesChristine Esler / Mary Neuhaus vs Valerie Anderson / Donna Salvatore6-4, 4-2
L#1 DoublesMandy Shaw / Christine Kupfer vs Janine Stalcup / Michelle Jurcenko1-6, 4-6
2026-07-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Kupfer / Mandy Shaw vs Laura Knapp / Maria Lobo-Corey3-6, 6-5
2026-07-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMandy Shaw / Christine Kupfer vs Susan Ellison / Masayo Kobashi5-7, 1-4
W#1 DoublesChristine Kupfer / Mandy Shaw vs Lynn Callahan / Erin Wyatt6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCarol Swanson / Megan Crisham vs Ryoko Howell / Deborah Sonoda4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Neuhaus / Antje Boeing vs Rosemary Wheeler / Ellen Kingsepp7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Kupfer / Mandy Shaw vs Vilma Mitev / Julie Gordon6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVicki Groo / Jeanne Whisler vs Lisa Greene / Cathy Lundstrom6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7 $2210227925244
2CDTA S 55&OW7.0 7.RCLB Eichner Tue 7 $22102231330284
3CDTA S 55&OW7.0 2.NTC Stalcup Thu 7 $2465201330249
4CDTA S 55&OW7.0 1.Wilm Ellison Sun 1 $2556151839307
5CDTA S 55&OW7.0 6.STP Lauterbach Sun 1 $2256161744309
6CDTA S 55&OW7.0 4.Tam Grabow Mon 7 $2247141941293
7CDTA S 55&OW7.0 3.Gnbk Edidin Mon 7 $3001253167408

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Alja Hessami-Maas
published 3.5
3.42
Mandy Shaw
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.41
Catherine Battin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Christine Kupfer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Antje Boeing
published 3.5
3.34
Naomi Fujimoto
published 3.5
3.34
Lucie Kreidler
published 3.5
3.34
Mary Gutowski-Hazzard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Regina Wootton
published 3.5
3.28
3.25
Denise Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Marie Dillon
published
3.22
Carol Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Christine Esler
published 3.5
3.20
Vicki Groo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Jeanne Whisler
published 3.5
3.15
Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Megan Crisham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Diana Harris
published 3
Mary Neuhaus
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Patty Lynch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Dillon + Alja Hessami-Maas6165% games+14.0% vs expected
Lucie Kreidler + Catherine Battin10358% games+11.2% vs expected
Marie Dillon + Antje Boeing12063% games+8.2% vs expected
Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt + Megan Crisham4354% games+7.4% vs expected
Marie Dillon + Paula Grabow Duignan13554% games+7.1% vs expected
Mary Gutowski-Hazzard + Catherine Battin4258% games+5.5% vs expected
Megan Crisham + Denise Schneider6754% games+4.7% vs expected
Lucie Kreidler + Mary Gutowski-Hazzard4255% games+4.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alja Hessami-Maas
212W–213L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Mandy Shaw
95W–71L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Catherine Battin
114W–84L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Christine Kupfer
111W–70L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Antje Boeing
92W–74L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Naomi Fujimoto
65W–56L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Lucie Kreidler
165W–131L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Mary Gutowski-Hazzard
75W–63L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Regina Wootton
25W–23L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Paula Grabow Duignan
118W–82L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Denise Schneider
101W–70L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
Marie Dillon
44W–33L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Carol Swanson
37W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Christine Esler
143W–102L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Vicki Groo
24W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Jeanne Whisler
26W–13L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt
156W–115L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Megan Crisham
138W–161L career · 1 line in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
3
Diana Harris
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Neuhaus
8W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patty Lynch
28W–28L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.