Teams

CDTA S 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22

1Summer 55&O WN · WE

21 players · average NTRP 3.47 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesMaria Lobo-Corey / Suzanne Losasso vs Moon Kaneshiro / Chris Nelson6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSvetlana Kanev / Kelly Matthews-Pluta vs Irene Okada / Kimberly Pfahl3-6, 4-6
2026-07-30Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMagdalena Galinska / Irene Salerno vs Stephanie Batka / Kimberly Wise4-6, 3-4
W#1 DoublesSang Boon Lee / Anne Ryan vs Barbara Chmieleski / Donna Salvatore6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMagdalena Galinska / Irene Salerno vs Valerie Anderson / Cynthia Rowe6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMagdalena Galinska / Irene Salerno vs Mindey Johnson / Linda Meyer7-5, 1-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMaria Lobo-Corey / Irene Salerno vs Tina Schauls / Sandra Villa7-5, 5-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7 $2210227925244
2CDTA S 55&OW7.0 7.RCLB Eichner Tue 7 $22102231330284
3CDTA S 55&OW7.0 2.NTC Stalcup Thu 7 $2465201330249
4CDTA S 55&OW7.0 1.Wilm Ellison Sun 1 $2556151839307
5CDTA S 55&OW7.0 6.STP Lauterbach Sun 1 $2256161744309
6CDTA S 55&OW7.0 4.Tam Grabow Mon 7 $2247141941293
7CDTA S 55&OW7.0 3.Gnbk Edidin Mon 7 $3001253167408

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Masako Ueda
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.58
Tracy Meyer
published
3.57
Dawn Kenny
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.56
Nancy Manolis
published 4
3.54
Suzanne Losasso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Katherine Moll
published 3.5
3.46
Maria Lobo-Corey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Kathy Kasiurak
published 3.5
3.38
Kelly Matthews-Pluta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Irene Salerno
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Sang Boon Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Linda Genty
published 3.5
3.31
Rosemary Swierk
published 3.5
3.28
Jeanne Tromp
published 3.5
3.26
Paula McKendry
published 3.5
Anne Ryan
published 3.5
3.18
Svetlana Kanev
published 3.5
3.15
Magdalena Galinska
published 3.5
3.02
Christie Jordan
published 3
2.97
Modupe Sobo
published 3
Laura Knapp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Lobo-Corey + Nancy Manolis9360% games+4.5% vs expected
Modupe Sobo + Masako Ueda6258% games+3.8% vs expected
Paula McKendry + Kelly Matthews-Pluta5360% games+3.7% vs expected
Paula McKendry + Linda Genty8453% games+0.5% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Masako Ueda14951% games−0.9% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Irene Salerno15852% games−1.2% vs expected
Kathy Kasiurak + Magdalena Galinska6151% games−10.2% vs expected
Kathy Kasiurak + Masako Ueda14161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Masako Ueda
156W–88L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
Tracy Meyer
76W–70L career · no lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Dawn Kenny
20W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
4
Nancy Manolis
114W–130L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Suzanne Losasso
33W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Katherine Moll
35W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Maria Lobo-Corey
265W–225L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Kathy Kasiurak
113W–82L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Kelly Matthews-Pluta
59W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Irene Salerno
67W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
Sang Boon Lee
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Linda Genty
86W–50L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Rosemary Swierk
70W–29L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Jeanne Tromp
144W–60L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Paula McKendry
88W–95L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Anne Ryan
22W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Svetlana Kanev
122W–138L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Magdalena Galinska
96W–116L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
3
Christie Jordan
84W–43L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Modupe Sobo
43W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Laura Knapp
55W–46L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.