Teams

FD 6.0 MM2 Frazier

2024 NEOTA Fusion Doubles · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Fusion Doubles

20 players · average NTRP 3.28 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Fusion Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FD 6.0 MM2 Frazier9125514174
2FD 6.0 NC Snyder8221921216
3FD 6.0 CV Carroll64151533264
4FD 6.0 TP Licari64141635291
5FD 6.0 CSC Jarus64161437294
6FD 6.0 MV1 Chuko64141638287
7FD 6.0 MV2 Herbruck55181229244
8FD 6.0 MV3 Ung46141634256
9FD 6.0 CC Lombardo46141635273
10FD 6.0 WR Treblas37131736276
11FD 6.0 PM Shaffer37111941303
12FD 6.0 MM1 Bode01052552338

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Abe Waziri
published 3.5
3.31
Ashley Frazier
published 3.5
3.19
Doug Michelsen
published 3.5
3.14
Hazel Desamito
published 3.5
3.12
Caitlin MacDonald
published 3.5
3.11
Kin Mei
published
3.09
Julia Pruchnicki
published
3.04
Santos Suarez
published
3.04
Ben Zagorski
published 3
2.97
Shawn Sun
published
2.88
Nicole Drahuschak
published
2.79
Sherry Carbeck
published
Amy Gyetko
published 3
2.63
Gina Perez
published 3
2.63
Amanda Thome
published 3
2.34
John Diemer
published
Jay Acharya
published
Jenny Kuhn
published
John Keller
published
Steven Pauwels
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Frazier + Caitlin MacDonald171054% games+7.8% vs expected
Hazel Desamito + Kin Mei7358% games+6.5% vs expected
Ben Zagorski + Santos Suarez11459% games+5.6% vs expected
Ashley Frazier + Nicole Drahuschak6256% games+3.4% vs expected
Kin Mei + Nicole Drahuschak4348% games−4.5% vs expected
Ben Zagorski + Steven Pauwels6455% gamesnot enough data
Caitlin MacDonald + Nicole Drahuschak3352% gamesnot enough data
Caitlin MacDonald + Kin Mei224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abe Waziri
25W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.46
3.5
Ashley Frazier
98W–60L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Doug Michelsen
83W–68L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Hazel Desamito
39W–36L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Caitlin MacDonald
51W–46L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
Kin Mei
94W–80L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
Julia Pruchnicki
40W–40L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.09
Santos Suarez
49W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Ben Zagorski
73W–45L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04
Shawn Sun
22W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.97
Nicole Drahuschak
56W–38L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
Sherry Carbeck
109W–97L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Amy Gyetko
21W–23L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Gina Perez
41W–55L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
2.63
3
Amanda Thome
41W–41L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
2.63
John Diemer
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
2.34
Jay Acharya
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jenny Kuhn
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Keller
15W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Pauwels
39W–32L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.