Teams

FD 6.0 WR Treblas

2024 NEOTA Fusion Doubles · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Fusion Doubles

20 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Fusion Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FD 6.0 MM2 Frazier9125514174
2FD 6.0 NC Snyder8221921216
3FD 6.0 CV Carroll64151533264
4FD 6.0 TP Licari64141635291
5FD 6.0 CSC Jarus64161437294
6FD 6.0 MV1 Chuko64141638287
7FD 6.0 MV2 Herbruck55181229244
8FD 6.0 MV3 Ung46141634256
9FD 6.0 CC Lombardo46141635273
10FD 6.0 WR Treblas37131736276
11FD 6.0 PM Shaffer37111941303
12FD 6.0 MM1 Bode01052552338

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brett Daberko
published 3.5
3.02
Anuj Sharma
published 3
2.90
Tony Cici
published
2.88
Jessica Treblas
published
2.85
Ashish Sharma
published 3
2.81
Katherine Bennett
published
2.79
Charles Ciborek
published 3
2.73
Ovidiu Pica
published
2.65
Brian Herx
published 3
2.53
Michelle Schenker
published
2.51
Teri Mollison
published
2.46
Olga Khrenova
published
2.35
Katie Fete
published
Gary Kern
published
Jennifer Brush
published
John Marshall
published
Julie Kolar
published
Kathleen Lanese
published
Melisa Anthony
published
Yiqin Huang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Herx + Gary Kern5846% games+10.3% vs expected
Tony Cici + Charles Ciborek7652% games+7.8% vs expected
Julie Kolar + Michelle Schenker5748% games+3.6% vs expected
Tony Cici + Brian Herx4445% games+0.3% vs expected
Jessica Treblas + Katie Fete3445% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Treblas + Michelle Schenker4349% gamesnot enough data
Brett Daberko + Charles Ciborek5255% gamesnot enough data
Melisa Anthony + Katie Fete3453% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brett Daberko
34W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Anuj Sharma
27W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
Tony Cici
44W–37L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.90
Jessica Treblas
58W–47L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Ashish Sharma
26W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.85
Katherine Bennett
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Charles Ciborek
39W–54L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Ovidiu Pica
32W–55L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Brian Herx
28W–40L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.65
Michelle Schenker
18W–32L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
2.53
Teri Mollison
35W–127L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
Olga Khrenova
16W–69L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.46
Katie Fete
19W–59L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.35
Gary Kern
25W–35L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Brush
32W–68L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Marshall
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Kolar
22W–31L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathleen Lanese
29W–57L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melisa Anthony
38W–60L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yiqin Huang
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.