Teams

FD 6.0 CC Lombardo

2024 NEOTA Fusion Doubles · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Fusion Doubles

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Fusion Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FD 6.0 MM2 Frazier9125514174
2FD 6.0 NC Snyder8221921216
3FD 6.0 CV Carroll64151533264
4FD 6.0 TP Licari64141635291
5FD 6.0 CSC Jarus64161437294
6FD 6.0 MV1 Chuko64141638287
7FD 6.0 MV2 Herbruck55181229244
8FD 6.0 MV3 Ung46141634256
9FD 6.0 CC Lombardo46141635273
10FD 6.0 WR Treblas37131736276
11FD 6.0 PM Shaffer37111941303
12FD 6.0 MM1 Bode01052552338

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Venkatraman Arakoni
published
3.02
Amalia Stoica
published 3
3.02
Sara Schaefer
published
2.98
Alamelu Arakoni
published 3
2.90
Stephanie Kevany
published
2.87
Jess Pleasant
published
2.85
Stephanie Mabee
published
2.83
Joe Bocanegra
published
2.83
Tisha Bell
published
2.71
Ann Cleminson
published 3
2.68
David Lombardo
published 3
2.59
Iuliana Grosescu
published
2.50
Henry Palattella
published
George Boukas
published
Ramana Bhavaraju
published
Thomas Kuttler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amalia Stoica + Iuliana Grosescu10263% games+12.7% vs expected
Sara Schaefer + Tisha Bell4648% games+11.5% vs expected
Tisha Bell + Amalia Stoica6453% games+10.2% vs expected
Tisha Bell + Ann Cleminson8358% games+6.3% vs expected
Stephanie Mabee + Alamelu Arakoni3355% games+6.3% vs expected
Iuliana Grosescu + Jess Pleasant4358% games+4.9% vs expected
Tisha Bell + Stephanie Kevany3350% games+3.0% vs expected
Alamelu Arakoni + Tisha Bell1643% games+1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Venkatraman Arakoni
77W–61L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.30
3
Amalia Stoica
111W–92L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02
Sara Schaefer
46W–36L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Alamelu Arakoni
127W–82L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Stephanie Kevany
22W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Jess Pleasant
41W–36L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
Stephanie Mabee
78W–83L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
Joe Bocanegra
19W–28L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.83
Tisha Bell
103W–90L career · no lines in 2024
0%1%99%
2.83
3
Ann Cleminson
39W–29L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
3
David Lombardo
30W–70L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Iuliana Grosescu
48W–40L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59
Henry Palattella
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
2.50
George Boukas
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ramana Bhavaraju
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Kuttler
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.