Teams

CV-Sun City PD/Michele McGee

2023 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-20vs CV-Embassy Tennis Club/SashaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Delaney / Patricia Taylor vs Wendy Hertz-Polakov / Sue Velarde6-1, 6-0
2023-03-15vs CV-Cathedral Canyon/Jane PellerWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnn Oswald / Jill Delaney vs Julee Moore / Margaret Huck6-2, 6-1
2023-02-27vs CV-Desert Princess/Micale & OrbanWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Delaney / Judy Theriault vs Sanae Chance / Andrea Primer6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJill Delaney / Lesley Gagnon vs Betty Grant / Nancy Anderson6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarbara McDonald / Jill Delaney vs Susan Hope / Kathy Rogers6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-02-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesJill Delaney / Barbara McDonald vs Jayne Spector / Molly Woods6-3, 6-4
2023-01-31vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/D MacdonaldWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara McDonald / Jill Delaney vs Brenda Ouimet / Faith Zelenko7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Linda Johnson
published
3.45
Patricia Taylor
published
3.43
Judy Theriault
published
3.37
Jill Delaney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.28
Lesley Gagnon
published
3.07
Terri Johnson
published
2.70
Ann Oswald
published 3
Faith Ricciuti
published
Michele Mcgee
published
Mona Klimmek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Johnson + Mona Klimmek404 matchesnot enough data
Linda Johnson + Jill Delaney303 matchesnot enough data
Lesley Gagnon + Patricia Taylor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Johnson
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Patricia Taylor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.45
Judy Theriault
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Jill Delaney
102W–63L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Lesley Gagnon
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Terri Johnson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.07
3
Ann Oswald
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
Faith Ricciuti
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michele Mcgee
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mona Klimmek
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.