Teams

VAMOS

2024 Pine Belt Singles League · 3.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-15vs Knight Petal CCWon 21
L#1 SinglesMehar Virdi vs Patrick Lamb6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMichael Butler vs Tyler Watkins6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesAllen Boleware vs Joshua Forsythe6-2, 6-1
2024-12-03vs Malone 3.0Won 21
L#1 SinglesAllen Boleware vs Bradley Floore3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMichael Butler vs Mark Butler7-6, 7-5
W#3 SinglesChandler Laudenheimer vs Shea Malone6-4, 6-4
2024-11-25vs Boykin 3.0 singlesWon 21
W#1 SinglesAllen Boleware vs Roberto Amay6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichael Butler vs Alen Hajnal4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesMehar Virdi vs Michael Ouellette6-1, 7-6
2024-11-24vs BackhandersLost 12
L#1 SinglesMehar Virdi vs Will Stevens7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMichael Butler vs Jeremy Deans2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesAllen Boleware vs Tom Hall6-1, 6-1
2024-11-20vs Knight Petal CCLost 03
L#1 SinglesMehar Virdi vs Rob Knight2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesChandler Laudenheimer vs Joshua Forsythe1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAllen Boleware vs Wes Carlisle6-7, 4-6
2024-11-05vs Malone 3.0Won 21
L#1 SinglesAllen Boleware vs Bradley Floore1-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesMehar Virdi vs Mark Butler6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesChandler Laudenheimer vs Shea Malone6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-10-29vs Boykin 3.0 singlesWon 21
L#1 SinglesChandler Laudenheimer vs Alen Hajnal5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesMehar Virdi vs Roberto Amay7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAllen Boleware vs Jamie Boykin6-3, 6-4
2024-10-22vs BackhandersLost 12
L#1 SinglesChandler Laudenheimer vs Will Stevens5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichael Butler vs Charles Hanson5-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesMehar Virdi vs Reagan Roseberry6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Allen Boleware
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.88
Michael Butler
usually #2 Singles 89%, also #3 Singles 11% · published
2.83
Chandler Laudenheimer
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
2.81
Mehar Virdi
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Singles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Butler + Allen Boleware213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allen Boleware
70W–33L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
Michael Butler
50W–34L career · 9 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.88
3
Chandler Laudenheimer
21W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
Mehar Virdi
40W–54L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.