Teams

Backhanders

2024 Pine Belt Singles League · 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-11vs Knight Petal CCLost 12
L#1 SinglesEthan Moore vs Rob Knight4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesCharles Hanson vs Matt Dillon6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTom Hall vs Wes Carlisle1-6, 2-6
2024-12-03vs Boykin 3.0 singlesWon 30
W#1 SinglesWill Stevens vs Alen Hajnal6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesEthan Moore vs Michael Ouellette6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesCharles Hanson vs Jason Boykin6-1, 6-1
2024-12-01vs Knight Petal CCWon 21
W#1 SinglesJeremy Deans vs Patrick Lamb6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesWill Stevens vs Joshua Forsythe6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesTom Hall vs Matt Dillon3-6, 0-6
2024-11-24vs VAMOSWon 21
W#1 SinglesWill Stevens vs Mehar Virdi5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJeremy Deans vs Michael Butler6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesTom Hall vs Allen Boleware1-6, 1-6
2024-11-21vs Malone 3.0Won 21
L#1 SinglesReagan Roseberry vs Bradley Floore1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesEthan Moore vs Shea Malone6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesWill Stevens vs Avery Hanson6-0, 6-4
2024-11-05vs Boykin 3.0 singlesLost 12
L#1 SinglesJeremy Deans vs Alen Hajnal6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCharles Hanson vs Jamie Boykin6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesReagan Roseberry vs Jerome Kolbo4-6, 1-6
2024-10-29vs Malone 3.0Won 21
W#1 SinglesEthan Moore vs Shea Malone6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJeremy Deans vs Brett Jones6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesCharles Hanson vs Brian Long1-6, 5-7
2024-10-22vs VAMOSWon 21
W#1 SinglesWill Stevens vs Chandler Laudenheimer5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCharles Hanson vs Michael Butler7-5, 6-3
L#3 SinglesReagan Roseberry vs Mehar Virdi1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Jeremy Deans
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.79
Charles Hanson
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.77
Will Stevens
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
2.62
Ethan Moore
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.51
Tom Hall
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Reagan Roseberry
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Deans + Will Stevens1437% games−4.1% vs expected
Will Stevens + Ethan Moore4251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeremy Deans
20W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
2.96
3.5
Charles Hanson
17W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.79
Will Stevens
17W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.77
Ethan Moore
12W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.62
Tom Hall
5W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
Reagan Roseberry
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.