Teams

MAC-Mangan

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Desiree Bliss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.89
Barbara Gram
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Anne Mangan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results6 ties
2020-02-16Won 20
W#1 DoublesMolly Hisatomi / Anne Mangan vs Clair Charlton / Julie Dicks6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBarbara Gram vs Heather Davidson6-0, 6-0
2020-02-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesMolly Hisatomi / Anne Mangan vs Amy Mai / Jody Yates6-4, 6-3
2020-02-01Won 30
W#1 DoublesMolly Hisatomi / Anne Mangan vs Bethany Kelly / Jessica Greenman6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBarbara Gram vs Erin Dineen6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNatalie Mesnier / Desiree Bliss vs Harshi Waters / Jennifer Clark6-2, 6-1
2020-01-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesMolly Hisatomi / Anne Mangan vs Anne Johnson / Patricia Kuchar5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2020-01-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDesiree Bliss / Barbara Gram vs Erin Gleason / Emily Harrington3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2020-01-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Mangan / Molly Hisatomi vs Trish Peters / Penny Langland6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Desiree Bliss
65W–35L career
0%95%5%
3.39
3
Barbara Gram
127W–129L career
0%97%3%
2.89
3
Anne Mangan
62W–74L career
6%91%4%
2.75

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.