Teams

GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M(Rafaeian)(EPTC#2)

2022 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE · 7.0 ADULT MEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GREATER EL PASO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-14vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M:(Orozco)(TW#2)Won 20
W#1 DoublesCarl Daniel / Charles Stephens vs Osvaldo Orozco / Ralph Rasura6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBill Garcia / Jorge Kareh vs Ruben Martinez / Friedrich Ransom-Becker6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMiguel Diaz / Ed Savedra vs Ray Bonds / James McCleland1-0
W#2 DoublesMIN KIM / William Levin vs Ricardo Gonzalez / Javier Baeza1-0
L#1 DoublesJorge Kareh / EDMUND OSEI-WUSU vs Gerardo Gomez / Ed de la Fuente2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMIN KIM / William Levin vs James McCleland / Michael Bezemek1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMiguel Diaz / Ed Savedra vs Dennis McElveen / Henry Costa6-0, 6-1
2022-07-31vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M(Tepsick)(TW#1)Won 21
L#1 DoublesBill Garcia / Charles Stephens vs Jay Smith / Yevgenko Makarov1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarl Daniel / Miguel Diaz vs Christopher Mowad / David Williams3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Burns / MIN KIM vs Eloy Tinajero / James Upson6-3, 6-3
2022-07-24vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M:(Orozco)(TW#2)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesRobert Burns / MIN KIM vs Ruben Martinez / Richard Salazar6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMiguel Diaz / Charles Stephens vs Marcos Calderon / Greg Garcia7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEd Savedra / James Lambeth vs Ken O'Neal / Osvaldo Orozco6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 DoublesWilliam Levin / SIMON SILVA vs Michael Bezemek / James McCleland6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Burns / MIN KIM vs Ricardo Gonzalez / Javier Baeza7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarl Daniel / Miguel Diaz vs Ray Bonds / Gerardo Gomez6-4, 6-2
2022-07-10vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M(Tepsick)(TW#1)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMiguel Diaz / MIN KIM vs Christopher Mowad / Jose Sanchez6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBill Garcia / Jorge Kareh vs Thomas Lore / Jay Smith6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEd Savedra / EDMUND OSEI-WUSU vs Eloy Tinajero / Yevgenko Makarov6-7, 4-6
2022-06-26vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M:(Orozco)(TW#2)Won 21
L#1 DoublesMiguel Diaz / Jorge Kareh vs Marcos Calderon / Greg Garcia0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMIN KIM / Robert Burns vs Alex Trachter / Ralph Rasura6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJames Lambeth / Bill Garcia vs Friedrich Ransom-Becker / Richard Salazar6-3, 6-4
2022-06-12vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M(Tepsick)(TW#1)Split 11
W#1 DoublesMIN KIM / Miguel Diaz vs James Upson / Jay Smith7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Burns / SIMON SILVA vs Yevgenko Makarov / Eloy Tinajero6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 ADULT MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
EDMUND OSEI-WUSU
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Ed Savedra
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.80
James Lambeth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.78
Charles Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Bill Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Carl Daniel
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jorge Kareh
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
MIN KIM
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Manouchehr Refaeian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Burns
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
SIMON SILVA
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
William Levin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MIN KIM + Robert Burns5162% games+13.7% vs expected
Manouchehr Refaeian + MIN KIM5452% games+0.5% vs expected
MIN KIM + EDMUND OSEI-WUSU3543% games−5.9% vs expected
SIMON SILVA + William Levin5363% gamesnot enough data
Manouchehr Refaeian + EDMUND OSEI-WUSU2445% gamesnot enough data
EDMUND OSEI-WUSU + Robert Burns4251% gamesnot enough data
Charles Stephens + MIN KIM224 matchesnot enough data
Bill Garcia + James Lambeth224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
EDMUND OSEI-WUSU
48W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Ed Savedra
58W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.93
3
James Lambeth
108W–107L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Charles Stephens
40W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Bill Garcia
6W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Carl Daniel
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jorge Kareh
74W–111L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
MIN KIM
120W–80L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
Manouchehr Refaeian
109W–95L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Robert Burns
61W–46L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
SIMON SILVA
35W–20L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Levin
18W–9L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.