Teams

GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M(Phinney)(EPTC#1)

2022 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE · 7.0 ADULT MEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / GREATER EL PASO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesRay Bonds / James McCleland vs Miguel Diaz / Ed Savedra0-1
L#2 DoublesRicardo Gonzalez / Javier Baeza vs MIN KIM / William Levin0-1
W#1 DoublesGerardo Gomez / Ed de la Fuente vs Jorge Kareh / EDMUND OSEI-WUSU6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJames McCleland / Michael Bezemek vs MIN KIM / William Levin6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDennis McElveen / Henry Costa vs Miguel Diaz / Ed Savedra0-6, 1-6
2022-07-31vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M:(Orozco)(TW#2)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Bezemek / James McCleland vs Osvaldo Orozco / Ruben Martinez6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHenry Costa / Angel Garcia vs Greg Garcia / Ken O'Neal7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJavier Baeza / Ricardo Gonzalez vs Fernando Lopez / Marcos Calderon3-6, 5-7
2022-07-30vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M(Tepsick)(TW#1)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRon Pate / Ray Bonds vs Jay Smith / Yevgenko Makarov3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJavier Baeza / Henry Costa vs Paul Leslie / David Williams4-6, 3-6
2022-07-24vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M(Tepsick)(TW#1)Won 21
W#1 DoublesEd de la Fuente / Gerardo Gomez vs Jose Sanchez / Craig Fortune6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJavier Baeza / Angel Garcia vs Thomas Lore / Yevgenko Makarov4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Bezemek / James McCleland vs Paul Leslie / David Williams5-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesMichael Bezemek / James McCleland vs William Levin / SIMON SILVA7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRicardo Gonzalez / Javier Baeza vs Robert Burns / MIN KIM5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRay Bonds / Gerardo Gomez vs Carl Daniel / Miguel Diaz4-6, 2-6
2022-07-10vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M:(Orozco)(TW#2)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRon Pate / Ed de la Fuente vs Osvaldo Orozco / Marcos Calderon6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGerardo Gomez / Ray Bonds vs Friedrich Ransom-Becker / Richard Salazar6-0, 6-3
2022-06-26vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M(Tepsick)(TW#1)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Bezemek / James McCleland vs Jay Smith / Eloy Tinajero6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDennis McElveen / Angel Garcia vs James Upson / David Williams6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRay Bonds / Antonio Marquez vs Craig Fortune / Jose Sanchez0-6, 4-6
2022-06-12vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M:(Orozco)(TW#2)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDennis McElveen / Angel Garcia vs Ruben Martinez / Friedrich Ransom-Becker6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRay Bonds / Ron Pate vs Alex Trachter / Ralph Rasura2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJavier Baeza / Ricardo Gonzalez vs Greg Garcia / Marcos Calderon4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 ADULT MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Gerardo Gomez
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
Edgar Phinney
published 3.5
3.11
Angel Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Antonio Marquez
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.68
James McCleland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Dennis McElveen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Henry Costa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Javier Baeza
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Bezemek
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ray Bonds
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Ron Pate
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Bezemek + James McCleland7357% gamesnot enough data
Henry Costa + Angel Garcia2338% gamesnot enough data
James McCleland + Antonio Marquez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gerardo Gomez
72W–51L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Edgar Phinney
1W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Angel Garcia
62W–57L career · 6 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Antonio Marquez
31W–64L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
James McCleland
80W–75L career · 12 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Dennis McElveen
54W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Henry Costa
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Javier Baeza
15W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Bezemek
102W–87L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ray Bonds
67W–58L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ron Pate
22W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.