Teams

GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M:(Orozco)(TW#2)

2022 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE · 7.0 ADULT MEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / GREATER EL PASO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesOsvaldo Orozco / Ralph Rasura vs Carl Daniel / Charles Stephens7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRuben Martinez / Friedrich Ransom-Becker vs Bill Garcia / Jorge Kareh1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-08-07vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M(Tepsick)(TW#1)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMarcos Calderon / Greg Garcia vs Yevgenko Makarov / Jay Smith1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesOsvaldo Orozco / Ruben Martinez vs Paul Leslie / David Williams1-6, 1-6
2022-07-31vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M(Phinney)(EPTC#1)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesOsvaldo Orozco / Ruben Martinez vs Michael Bezemek / James McCleland2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGreg Garcia / Ken O'Neal vs Henry Costa / Angel Garcia6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesFernando Lopez / Marcos Calderon vs Javier Baeza / Ricardo Gonzalez6-3, 7-5
L#1 DoublesRuben Martinez / Richard Salazar vs Robert Burns / MIN KIM1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMarcos Calderon / Greg Garcia vs Miguel Diaz / Charles Stephens6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKen O'Neal / Osvaldo Orozco vs Ed Savedra / James Lambeth3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-07-17vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M(Tepsick)(TW#1)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKen O'Neal / Ruben Martinez vs James Upson / Paul Leslie1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGreg Garcia / Marcos Calderon vs Jose Sanchez / Yevgenko Makarov1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesOsvaldo Orozco / Ralph Rasura vs Christopher Mowad / Eloy Tinajero3-6, 6-7
2022-07-10vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M(Phinney)(EPTC#1)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesOsvaldo Orozco / Marcos Calderon vs Ron Pate / Ed de la Fuente3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFriedrich Ransom-Becker / Richard Salazar vs Gerardo Gomez / Ray Bonds0-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesMarcos Calderon / Greg Garcia vs Miguel Diaz / Jorge Kareh6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAlex Trachter / Ralph Rasura vs MIN KIM / Robert Burns0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesFriedrich Ransom-Becker / Richard Salazar vs James Lambeth / Bill Garcia3-6, 4-6
2022-06-25vs GEPTA-7.0-Adult/M(Tepsick)(TW#1)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAlex Trachter / Ralph Rasura vs Craig Fortune / Jose Sanchez3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFernando Lopez / Ken O'Neal vs Thomas Lore / Paul Leslie4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGreg Garcia / Marcos Calderon vs Jay Smith / David Williams6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesRuben Martinez / Friedrich Ransom-Becker vs Dennis McElveen / Angel Garcia2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlex Trachter / Ralph Rasura vs Ray Bonds / Ron Pate6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGreg Garcia / Marcos Calderon vs Javier Baeza / Ricardo Gonzalez6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 ADULT MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Greg Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.56
Alex Trachter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Friedrich Ransom-Becker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Fernando Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.82
Daniel Gallatin
published 3
Ken O'Neal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Marcos Calderon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Osvaldo Orozco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ralph Rasura
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Richard Salazar
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Ruben Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ralph Rasura + Richard Salazar1542% games−3.7% vs expected
Greg Garcia + Marcos Calderon4250% gamesnot enough data
Greg Garcia + Osvaldo Orozco3250% gamesnot enough data
Marcos Calderon + Ralph Rasura224 matchesnot enough data
Ralph Rasura + Daniel Gallatin224 matchesnot enough data
Fernando Lopez + Osvaldo Orozco224 matchesnot enough data
Alex Trachter + Greg Garcia033 matchesnot enough data
Alex Trachter + Ralph Rasura123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Greg Garcia
36W–54L career · 7 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Alex Trachter
36W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Friedrich Ransom-Becker
8W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Fernando Lopez
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Daniel Gallatin
53W–88L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Ken O'Neal
11W–45L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marcos Calderon
22W–27L career · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data
Osvaldo Orozco
40W–56L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ralph Rasura
57W–78L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Salazar
22W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ruben Martinez
6W–21L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.