Teams

GJTC DBEEHLER

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-17vs GJTC JJOLLEYWon 10
W#1 SinglesHannah Bou-Matar vs Jeena Jolley6-3, 6-2
2021-05-10vs GJTC SHURTWon 10
W#1 SinglesHannah Bou-Matar vs Rhonda Repshire6-4, 6-0
2021-05-03vs GJTC CMEILWon 10
W#2 DoublesHannah Bou-Matar / Alicia Swink vs Kris Meil / Kate Wender7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-26vs GJTC JJOLLEYWon 10
W#1 SinglesHannah Bou-Matar vs Val Kennedy6-1, 6-0
2021-04-22vs GJTC SHURTWon 10
W#1 SinglesHannah Bou-Matar vs Michelle Killian6-1, 6-1
2021-04-12vs GJTC CMEILWon 10
W#1 SinglesHannah Bou-Matar vs Kate Wender6-0, 6-0
2021-04-05vs GJTC JJOLLEYWon 10
W#1 SinglesHannah Bou-Matar vs Megan Barnhurst6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Hannah Bou-Matar
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.89
Karen Kelley
published
Hua Zhao
published 3
2.73
Lorene Ramirez
published
2.72
Maggie Coleman
published
2.69
Diana Beehler
published 3
2.68
Cynthia Bulgier
published 3
2.65
Kathy Ludlam
published
2.31
Eileen Arja
published 2.5
Cheryl Bodie
published
Rachel Gidley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorene Ramirez + Hua Zhao13175% games+17.1% vs expected
Eileen Arja + Maggie Coleman5842% games−2.1% vs expected
Eileen Arja + Lorene Ramirez3247% games−2.4% vs expected
Eileen Arja + Diana Beehler3745% games−2.9% vs expected
Maggie Coleman + Kathy Ludlam1639% games−8.2% vs expected
Eileen Arja + Kathy Ludlam2343% gamesnot enough data
Hua Zhao + Kathy Ludlam4156% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Coleman + Hua Zhao404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hannah Bou-Matar
150W–55L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.44
Karen Kelley
15W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Hua Zhao
27W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lorene Ramirez
33W–14L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Maggie Coleman
40W–33L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Diana Beehler
27W–39L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Cynthia Bulgier
13W–20L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
Kathy Ludlam
34W–33L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
2.5
Eileen Arja
22W–43L career · no lines in 2021
0%92%8%
2.31
Cheryl Bodie
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rachel Gidley
20W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.