Teams

GJTC SHURT

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-24vs GJTC JJOLLEYWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Shuman / Cathy Dokoupil vs Theresa Heer / Leia Hillan6-3, 6-1
2021-05-20vs GJTC CMEILWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Elzas / Cathy Dokoupil vs Sarah Butterfield / Natasha Snider6-1, 6-2
2021-05-10vs GJTC DBEEHLERWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Killian / Cathy Dokoupil vs Cheryl Bodie / Kathy Ludlam7-6, 6-3
2021-04-30vs GJTC CMEILWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Shuman / Cathy Dokoupil vs Kimberly Langston / Kris Meil6-3, 6-2
2021-04-22vs GJTC DBEEHLERWon 10
W#2 DoublesCathy Dokoupil / Valerie Lambdin vs Cheryl Bodie / Diana Beehler6-3, 6-3
2021-04-20vs GJTC DBEEHLERLost 01
L#3 DoublesCathy Dokoupil / Crystal Murphy vs Kathy Ludlam / Hua Zhao2-6, 0-6
2021-04-12vs GJTC JJOLLEYLost 01
L#1 DoublesCathy Dokoupil / Heather Shuman vs Stephanie Rush / Meredith Gardner5-7, 3-6
2021-04-05vs GJTC CMEILWon 10
W#2 DoublesCathy Dokoupil / Rhonda Repshire vs Sarah Butterfield / Kimberly Langston6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Heather Shuman
published 3.5
3.19
Rhonda Repshire
published
2.92
Cathy Dokoupil
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
Crystal Murphy
published 2.5
Kandis Aggen
published
Laura Mourning
published
Michelle Killian
published
Shelly Hurt
published
Valerie Lambdin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Hurt + Valerie Lambdin9952% games−2.9% vs expected
Rhonda Repshire + Valerie Lambdin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Shuman
49W–41L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
Rhonda Repshire
36W–18L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.19
3
Cathy Dokoupil
68W–56L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
2.92
2.5
Crystal Murphy
12W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kandis Aggen
7W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Mourning
7W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Killian
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shelly Hurt
38W–27L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Valerie Lambdin
39W–21L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.