Teams

GJTC CMEIL

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-24vs GJTC DBEEHLERWon 10
W#1 DoublesJordan Preuss / Claire Meil vs Hua Zhao / Eileen Arja7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2021-05-20vs GJTC SHURTLost 01
L#2 SinglesJordan Preuss vs Michelle Killian4-6, 4-6
2021-05-10vs GJTC JJOLLEYWon 10
W#2 SinglesJordan Preuss vs Megan Barnhurst2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-03vs GJTC DBEEHLERLost 01
L#1 SinglesJordan Preuss vs Rachel Gidley1-6, 2-6
2021-04-30vs GJTC SHURTLost 01
L#2 SinglesJordan Preuss vs Shelly Hurt3-6, 4-6
2021-04-19vs GJTC JJOLLEYLost 01
L#2 SinglesJordan Preuss vs Megan Barnhurst1-6, 2-6
2021-04-12vs GJTC DBEEHLERWon 10
W#1 DoublesClaire Meil / Jordan Preuss vs Eileen Arja / Lorene Ramirez6-1, 6-3
2021-04-05vs GJTC SHURTWon 10
W#2 SinglesJordan Preuss vs Shelly Hurt4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Sarah Butterfield
published
3.04
Stephanie Bailey
published
3.01
Jordan Preuss
usually #2 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Kate Wender
published
2.81
Kimberly Langston
published
Claire Meil
published 3
2.75
Melissa Reams
published
Kris Meil
published
Natasha Snider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Bailey + Melissa Reams9453% games−0.4% vs expected
Melissa Reams + Natasha Snider224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Butterfield
49W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
3.52
Stephanie Bailey
14W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Jordan Preuss
52W–39L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%46%54%
3.01
Kate Wender
26W–24L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
Kimberly Langston
47W–27L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Claire Meil
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Melissa Reams
38W–14L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.75
Kris Meil
4W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Natasha Snider
10W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.