Teams

Dodson/40s/4.0,3.5,3.0/BC Day

2025 Man · Cov Tri Level 40 & Over - Women Day

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Tri Level 40 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Bridgette Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 4
3.44
Amy Malloy
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.38
Celeste Collins
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.29
Courtney Dodson
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3.5
3.06
Alixe Pizzo
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
2.84
Brittany MacMaster
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
Heather Vinet Jones
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
Japonica Cruise
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Katherine Hodgins
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Katie Kabrich
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published
Lauren Parks
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Lisa Hamaker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Lisa Naquin
usually #3 Doubles 65%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Mary Toce
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Michelle Pecoraro
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Toni Shepherd
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Violeta Daskalova
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brittany MacMaster + Katherine Hodgins5157% gamesnot enough data
Bridgette Taylor + Celeste Collins2447% gamesnot enough data
Amy Malloy + Alixe Pizzo4159% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Hamaker + Bridgette Taylor2353% gamesnot enough data
Violeta Daskalova + Heather Vinet Jones3248% gamesnot enough data
Japonica Cruise + Katherine Hodgins2345% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Pecoraro + Celeste Collins2343% gamesnot enough data
Amy Malloy + Celeste Collins224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bridgette Taylor
14W–21L career · 25 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
3.5
Amy Malloy
32W–17L career · 30 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
3.5
Celeste Collins
32W–31L career · 42 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Courtney Dodson
18W–15L career · 22 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Alixe Pizzo
8W–10L career · 9 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Brittany MacMaster
23W–14L career · 20 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Heather Vinet Jones
7W–8L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Japonica Cruise
16W–13L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Hodgins
25W–18L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Kabrich
10W–15L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Parks
27W–5L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Hamaker
6W–14L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Naquin
6W–21L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Toce
30W–23L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Pecoraro
11W–14L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Toni Shepherd
31W–24L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Violeta Daskalova
35W–28L career · 46 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.