Teams

White 55s 6.5 Combo W Tues PM

2024 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women 55 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-04vs Kirby 55s 6.5 Combo W Tues PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesMyra Propst / Kathy Chinnis vs Janice Wilkinson / Laura Vary6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-01vs Michaels 55s 6.5 Combo W Tues PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathryn Michaud / Myra Propst vs Jan Whittaker / Sherri Frazier6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesJudy Eaton / Myra Propst vs Jacqueline Herron / Paige Turner4-6, 3-6
2024-09-03vs Gorham 55s 6.5 Combo Tues PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Elam / Myra Propst vs Jennie Pekarne / Bobbi McEntee6-4, 6-4
2024-08-27vs Michaels 55s 6.5 Combo W Tues PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesJudy Eaton / Myra Propst vs Vickie Degges / Laura Walters6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesKathy Chinnis / Myra Propst vs Tiffany Weeks / Mari Miller6-2, 7-5
2024-08-20vs Kirby 55s 6.5 Combo W Tues PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Elam / Myra Propst vs Laura Vary / Janice Wilkinson0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Kathryn Michaud
published
3.32
Gladys Dunn
published
3.25
Judy Eaton
published
3.24
Kathy Chinnis
published
3.19
Betsey Wells
published 3.5
3.14
Debra Hendricks
published 3.5
2.97
Jill Elam
published
2.94
Betty Haggard
published 3.5
2.84
Sue White
published
2.83
Terri Laughlin
published
2.79
Susan Bailey
published
2.78
Cindy Wood
published 3
2.77
2.65
Myra Propst
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.65
Lydia Nadel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue White + Gladys Dunn213 matchesnot enough data
Sue White + Margaret Lynde-Rhyne033 matchesnot enough data
Betsey Wells + Lydia Nadel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Michaud
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
Gladys Dunn
28W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Judy Eaton
38W–21L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
Kathy Chinnis
17W–33L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Betsey Wells
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Debra Hendricks
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
Jill Elam
19W–30L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Betty Haggard
5W–23L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.94
Sue White
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Terri Laughlin
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Susan Bailey
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Cindy Wood
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Margaret Lynde-Rhyne
19W–30L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Myra Propst
146W–178L career · 7 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
Lydia Nadel
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.