Teams

NWillis (Park Road)

2025 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Sat AM

7 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-19vs MPettit (OPRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesJulie Busha vs Caroline Pickup6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNicole Yudin vs Margy Pettit6-4, 6-2
2025-07-12Lost 12
L#1 SinglesNily Willis vs Courtney Reynolds4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJulie Busha vs Lisa Kane6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDorothy Cato vs Jennifer Margulis6-0, 6-1
2025-06-28vs MPettit (OPRC)Won 21
L#1 SinglesMeredith Sweeney vs Liz Ostrow2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesDorothy Cato vs Margy Pettit6-3, 2-2
W#3 SinglesNily Willis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-21vs MPettit (OPRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesMonica Erb vs Caroline Pickup6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNicole Yudin vs Lisa Kane6-0, 6-3
2025-06-14vs MPettit (OPRC)Won 21
L#1 SinglesMeredith Sweeney vs Jennifer Gardiner2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesNicole Yudin vs Caroline Pickup6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMonica Erb vs Suzy Johnson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-07vs MPettit (OPRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesNicole Yudin vs Liz Ostrow4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJulie Busha vs Margy Pettit6-4, 6-1
2025-05-31vs MPettit (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJulie Busha vs Courtney Reynolds1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 40 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Sat AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWillis (Park Road)52111022175
2MPettit (OPRC)25101124174

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Monica Erb
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Nicole Yudin
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.08
Meredith Sweeney
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.00
Dorothy Cato
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.90
Julie Busha
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.82
Nily Willis
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.57
Pamela Burks
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Burks + Julie Busha303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Monica Erb
98W–78L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.20
4.5
Nicole Yudin
48W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.11
Meredith Sweeney
94W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Dorothy Cato
53W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
Julie Busha
35W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Nily Willis
100W–79L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Pamela Burks
207W–133L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.