Teams

Gill/JB/AP

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-16vs Daniel/JB/3OaksSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMeghan Scott vs Stephanie Romero3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMaggie Barnes vs Sarah Newbern4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-12-08vs Daniel/JB/3OaksLost 12
W#1 SinglesMaggie Barnes vs Lindi Wade7-6, 7-5
L#2 SinglesPaige Cox vs Morgan Davis-Daniel4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesRachael Rodery vs Stephanie Romero3-6, 1-6
2024-11-20vs Gifford/JB/JCCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAshlee Gill vs Mallory Hurst1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMeghan Scott vs Kirby Smith6-4, 6-4
2024-11-12vs Gifford/JB/JCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesAshlee Gill vs Taylor Kaloghirou6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesPaige Cox vs Alley Bell7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Ashlee Gill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Meghan Scott
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.92
Maggie Barnes
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Elizabeth Cox
published 3
2.74
Paige Cox
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.33
Rachael Rodery
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashlee Gill
22W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Meghan Scott
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Maggie Barnes
16W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Elizabeth Cox
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Paige Cox
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
2.74
Rachael Rodery
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.