Teams

Sunpro-Jensen/Waite

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 6.0W

12 players · average NTRP 2.94 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-26vs Cottonwood Club-KovacsovicsWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarrie Jensen / Marilyn Patch vs Lori Heimuli / Lili Leiataua Iosefa7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Murray / Patti Miner vs Karla Block / Kerri Erickson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-19vs Liberty Park Tennis-SwalbergWon 21
L#1 DoublesRebecca Waite / Karen Murray vs Maria Pettit / Diane Poole2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSue Ellen Vincent / Patti Miner vs Mary Jayne Child / KayeLynn BASTIAN6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKim Ward / Laura Wills-Mitchell vs Mary Jane Swalberg / Hege Farnsworth6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-12vs Park City MARC-PerryLost 12
L#1 DoublesCynthia Bedford / Marilyn Patch vs Sharon Bush / Karen Christian3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Woods / Kyoko Jensen vs Cathy Siegal / Patricia Moran0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Murray / Melissa Reoch vs Kathleen DiCesaris / Cynthia Perry6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-05-29vs Ivory Ridge-Adams/NelsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Wills-Mitchell / Carolyn Woods vs Cherylin Winkel / Cyndi Madsen2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie Jensen / Rebecca Waite vs Shellie Black / Elizabeth West7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSue Ellen Vincent / Patti Miner vs Christine Adams / Kris McDougal4-6, 4-6
2024-05-22vs Cottonwood Club-KovacsovicsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarilyn Patch / Cynthia Bedford vs Vicki Cox / Karla Block6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMelissa Reoch / Kyoko Jensen vs Magdalena Kovacsovics / Paula Naatz4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarrie Jensen / Kim Ward vs Kerri Erickson / Lili Leiataua Iosefa6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-15vs Liberty Park Tennis-SwalbergWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Reoch / Kyoko Jensen vs Diane Poole / Caryl Fletcher6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Waite / Carrie Jensen vs KayeLynn BASTIAN / Rebecca Harman4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKim Ward / Patti Miner vs Mary Jayne Child / LaRae Dean7-6, 7-6
2024-05-08vs Park City MARC-PerryLost 12
W#1 DoublesCynthia Bedford / Marilyn Patch vs Cynthia Perry / Suzette Cannon6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Woods / Kyoko Jensen vs Sharon Bush / Karen Christian2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Jensen / Kim Ward vs Cathy Siegal / Patricia Moran6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-24vs Ivory Ridge-Adams/NelsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesRebecca Waite / Carrie Jensen vs Elizabeth West / Cyndi Madsen0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Murray / Melissa Reoch vs Shirley Johnson / Christina Marshall6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSue Ellen Vincent / Patti Miner vs Christine Adams / Summer Borla4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Kyoko Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Carrie Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Cynthia Bedford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Melissa Reoch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Marilyn Patch
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.63
Patti Miner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.57
Laura Wills-Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.56
Karen Murray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.53
Rebecca Waite
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.45
Sue Ellen Vincent
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.20
Carolyn Woods
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Kim Ward
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Jensen + Melissa Reoch6263% games+10.2% vs expected
Melissa Reoch + Karen Murray18461% games+6.5% vs expected
Marilyn Patch + Carrie Jensen9652% games+2.1% vs expected
Carrie Jensen + Cynthia Bedford9355% games−1.5% vs expected
Marilyn Patch + Cynthia Bedford291953% games−4.7% vs expected
Carrie Jensen + Laura Wills-Mitchell4651% games−4.8% vs expected
Rebecca Waite + Carolyn Woods0543% games−5.4% vs expected
Laura Wills-Mitchell + Melissa Reoch5254% games−6.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kyoko Jensen
102W–119L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Carrie Jensen
138W–169L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Cynthia Bedford
90W–86L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Melissa Reoch
90W–77L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Marilyn Patch
100W–140L career · 9 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Patti Miner
23W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Laura Wills-Mitchell
74W–104L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.57
Karen Murray
56W–61L career · 4 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.56
Rebecca Waite
41W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
Sue Ellen Vincent
27W–54L career · 3 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.45
2.5
Carolyn Woods
27W–79L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.20
Kim Ward
2W–23L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.