Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Swalberg

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 6.0W

11 players · average NTRP 3.08 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-26vs Park City MARC-PerryLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaria Pettit / Diane Poole vs Marti Skjervem / Laura Maurer4-6, 4-6
2024-06-19vs Sunpro-Jensen/WaiteLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaria Pettit / Diane Poole vs Rebecca Waite / Karen Murray6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMary Jayne Child / KayeLynn BASTIAN vs Sue Ellen Vincent / Patti Miner4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Jane Swalberg / Hege Farnsworth vs Kim Ward / Laura Wills-Mitchell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-12vs Ivory Ridge-Adams/NelsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Harman / KayeLynn BASTIAN vs Christine Adams / Kris McDougal7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDiane Poole / Caryl Fletcher vs Cherylin Winkel / Cyndi Madsen7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHege Farnsworth / Nooshin Prasthofer vs Becky Nelson / Karlene Johnston6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-05vs Cottonwood Club-KovacsovicsWon 30
W#1 DoublesKayeLynn BASTIAN / Rebecca Harman vs Lori Heimuli / Susan Sandack6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaria Pettit / Caryl Fletcher vs Vicki Cox / LISA PERMENTER6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDiane Poole / LaRae Dean vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-22vs Park City MARC-PerrySplit 11
W#1 DoublesCamille Weaver / Rebecca Harman vs Sharon Bush / Cynthia Perry7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKayeLynn BASTIAN / Maria Pettit vs Marti Skjervem / Suzette Cannon6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-15vs Sunpro-Jensen/WaiteLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Poole / Caryl Fletcher vs Melissa Reoch / Kyoko Jensen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKayeLynn BASTIAN / Rebecca Harman vs Rebecca Waite / Carrie Jensen6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMary Jayne Child / LaRae Dean vs Kim Ward / Patti Miner6-7, 6-7
2024-05-08vs Ivory Ridge-Adams/NelsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesCamille Weaver / Rebecca Harman vs Cherylin Winkel / Cyndi Madsen2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKayeLynn BASTIAN / Diane Poole vs Shellie Black / Gayle Waldron6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMary Jane Swalberg / Mary Jayne Child vs Kris McDougal / Summer Borla3-6, 1-6
2024-05-01vs Cottonwood Club-KovacsovicsWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Poole / Maria Pettit vs Alison Parsons / Susan Sandack6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRebecca Harman / KayeLynn BASTIAN vs Lori Heimuli / LISA PERMENTER6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMary Jane Swalberg / Nooshin Prasthofer vs Lili Leiataua Iosefa / Mari Bickmore7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Camille Weaver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Diane Poole
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.90
Maria Pettit
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.89
Rebecca Harman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Hege Farnsworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Caryl Fletcher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.48
Mary Jane Swalberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
LaRae Dean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Jayne Child
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nooshin Prasthofer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

KayeLynn BASTIAN + Maria Pettit5649% games+4.6% vs expected
Mary Jane Swalberg + Maria Pettit81144% games+2.1% vs expected
Nooshin Prasthofer + Caryl Fletcher7448% games+0.0% vs expected
Nooshin Prasthofer + Mary Jane Swalberg51737% games−0.2% vs expected
Caryl Fletcher + Maria Pettit18854% games−0.5% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Maria Pettit61145% games−2.6% vs expected
Caryl Fletcher + KayeLynn BASTIAN8847% games−2.8% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + KayeLynn BASTIAN192450% games−3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Camille Weaver
141W–91L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Diane Poole
191W–165L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Maria Pettit
188W–196L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.90
Rebecca Harman
241W–300L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Hege Farnsworth
34W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Caryl Fletcher
142W–122L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 7 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
Mary Jane Swalberg
75W–203L career · 3 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.48
LaRae Dean
41W–66L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Mary Jayne Child
50W–107L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nooshin Prasthofer
97W–124L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.