Teams

Grey Oaks - Romano

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-02vs The Quarry - ShinnickLost 01
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Spinelli / Debra Logue vs Minde Shinnick / Greta Beatty6-7, 3-6
2024-11-18vs Naples Bay Resort - StaropoliLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Conversano / Debra Logue vs Dawn Burt / Sandee Kozel3-6, 4-6
2024-11-11vs Mediterra - FerraezSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDebra Logue / Jacqueline Spinelli vs Paula Hinegardner / Laura King4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Conversano / Julie Puntney vs Debbi Butz / Nancy Rutherford6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-04vs Cambier - GustWon 10
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Spinelli / Debra Logue vs Sheila MacNicol / Beth Solomon3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-21vs Flight Winner/ Marco YMCA - WashakLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Puntney / Debra Logue vs Andrea Washak / Bernadette DiPino1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Debra Logue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Carolyn Romano
published 4
3.77
3.55
3.32
Lorrie Lavery
published
3.30
Mary Conversano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jill Murray
published
Julie Puntney
published
Marie Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Wilson + Julie Puntney033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debra Logue
162W–90L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Carolyn Romano
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Cynthia Streibich
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Jacqueline Spinelli
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.55
Lorrie Lavery
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Mary Conversano
67W–89L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Jill Murray
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Puntney
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marie Wilson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.