Teams

Mediterra - Ferraez

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-02vs Flight Winner/ Marco YMCA - WashakLost 01
L#3 DoublesDebbi Butz / Joan Steere vs Donna Curry / Susanna Haedelt3-6, 2-6
2024-11-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesDebra Dager / Debbi Butz vs Deborah Washburn / Jennifer Seefeld1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-11-11vs Grey Oaks - RomanoWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebbi Butz / Nancy Rutherford vs Mary Conversano / Julie Puntney6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-04vs Naples Bay Resort - StaropoliLost 01
L#2 DoublesGinger Ferraez / Debra Dager vs Diane Cahill / Maureen Wells5-7, 4-6
2024-10-28vs The Quarry - ShinnickLost 01
L#2 DoublesDebbi Butz / Joan Steere vs Minde Shinnick / Greta Beatty2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Debra Dager
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
3.31
Debbi Butz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Nancy Rutherford
published
3.09
Maureen Rennie
published
Deborah Fernicola
published
Ginger Ferraez
published
Joan Steere
published
Laura King
published
Paula Hinegardner
published
Regina Gracie
published
Renee Desrosiers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Dager + Ginger Ferraez3550% gamesnot enough data
Joan Steere + Debra Gardner Hussey1641% gamesnot enough data
Laura King + Paula Hinegardner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debra Dager
47W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Debra Gardner Hussey
5W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Debbi Butz
28W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Nancy Rutherford
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Maureen Rennie
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Deborah Fernicola
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ginger Ferraez
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joan Steere
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura King
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Hinegardner
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Regina Gracie
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Renee Desrosiers
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.