Teams

Harmon

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - POCATELLO · Women 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.45 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-08vs GibsonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKaren McGee / Anne MacLachlan vs Kathy Dahlke / Venita Petti5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJamie Simmons vs Allyson Laible6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Grasso / Lorie Murray vs Amy Cunningham / Carrie Rose Lindley5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMikel Harmon / Kirsten Nickisch vs Patsy Lapointe / Leslie Mulholland6-4, 6-3
2022-08-08vs Lob SquadWon 30
W#1 DoublesKirsten Nickisch / Cara Sonnemann vs Sarah Davids / Joni Gates6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMikel Harmon / Jamie Simmons vs Shauna Myler / Quincy Sutton6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAnne MacLachlan / Christine Paulsen vs Michele Surmelis / Victoria Scharp6-3, 6-2
2022-08-04vs GibsonWon 31
W#1 DoublesCara Sonnemann / Mikel Harmon vs Alyce Brown / Venita Petti7-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesKirsten Nickisch vs Allyson Laible6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Jamie Simmons vs Patricia Bolinger / Patsy Lapointe7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnne MacLachlan / Karen McGee vs Donna Araki / Leslie Mulholland6-1, 6-1
2022-08-01vs Lob SquadWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaren Grasso / Christine Paulsen vs Joni Gates / Kim Hickey6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJamie Simmons vs Melissa Brake6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Lisa Nelson vs Wendy Elison / Rachel Mattson6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCara Sonnemann / Mikel Harmon vs Shauna Myler / Quincy Sutton2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-25vs GibsonWon 31
W#1 DoublesMikel Harmon / Theresa Mansfield vs Alyce Brown / Allyson Laible6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKirsten Nickisch vs Jane Gibson6-0, 3-0
L#2 DoublesLorie Murray / Jamie Simmons vs Patricia Bolinger / Amy Cunningham6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnne MacLachlan / Karen McGee vs Leslie Mulholland / Patsy Lapointe6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-20vs Lob SquadWon 40
W#1 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Anne MacLachlan vs Sarah Davids / Wendy Elison6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJamie Simmons vs Kim Hickey7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Nelson / Kirsten Nickisch vs Shauna Myler / Quincy Sutton6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTheresa Mansfield / Lorie Murray vs Camille Aguinaga / Lisa Holt6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jamie Simmons
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.47
Mikel Harmon
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.39
Teresa Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Cara Sonnemann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Theresa Mansfield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Lisa Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Anne MacLachlan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Christine Paulsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Kirsten Nickisch
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.85
Lorie Murray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Karen Grasso
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karen McGee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen McGee + Anne MacLachlan14956% games+3.7% vs expected
Lorie Murray + Christine Paulsen4350% games+1.4% vs expected
Mikel Harmon + Cara Sonnemann9353% games+0.2% vs expected
Lisa Nelson + Teresa Henderson181655% games+0.1% vs expected
Theresa Mansfield + Christine Paulsen111446% games−0.7% vs expected
Lisa Nelson + Cara Sonnemann4349% games−1.0% vs expected
Lorie Murray + Karen Grasso5848% games−2.6% vs expected
Karen McGee + Karen Grasso1438% games−4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jamie Simmons
66W–88L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Mikel Harmon
283W–136L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Teresa Henderson
127W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Cara Sonnemann
67W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Theresa Mansfield
75W–94L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Lisa Nelson
73W–131L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Anne MacLachlan
46W–38L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Christine Paulsen
60W–73L career · 2 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Kirsten Nickisch
98W–141L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Lorie Murray
51W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Karen Grasso
22W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen McGee
35W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.