Teams

4HV-SHIELDS 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F2

2022 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 75 COMBO SEM

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-12-10vs 5VTC-CORTINA 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F2Won 30
W#1 DoublesRaquel Clasby / Vivien Reece vs Amy Kaufman / Amanda Fox6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarla Booth / Julie Ewy vs Jules Felsecker / Marci Walker6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLinda Brennan / Kathie Seifert vs Inge Miller / Ellen Rambo6-4, 6-3
2022-12-04vs 2LIB-MARLEY 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F2Won 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Cooper / Vivien Reece vs Abigail Bremer / Megan Etheridge6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarla Booth / Julie Ewy vs Kate Farwell / Thu Kehn6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesConnie Nelson / Raquel Clasby vs Nori Flautner / Bettina Briceno-Abreu1-6, 1-6
2022-11-27Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRaquel Clasby / Vivien Reece vs Hilary Hayden / Frances Carlson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMarla Booth / Samina Siddiqui vs Christina Slade / Christine Kim3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Brennan / Sara Chang vs Molly Lipham / Lynn Henry5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesRaquel Clasby / Vivien Reece vs Barbara Carmack / Kathleen Hiner6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Brennan / Lori Reece vs Kimberly Webb / Karen Miller6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSamina Siddiqui / Deana Shields vs Kathy Christensen / Sharon Nicola6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-11-04vs 3CHIP-SHAW 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F2Won 21
W#1 DoublesVivien Reece / Heather Cooper vs Carol Miller / Mary Gregg5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathie Seifert / Linda Brennan vs Jessie Chung / Kathleen Green4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSara Chang / Samina Siddiqui vs Sarah Fahrbach / Jolanta Gallup5-7, 4-6
2022-10-28vs 5VTC-CORTINA 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F2Won 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Brennan / Sara Chang vs Amy Kaufman / Colleen Hughes6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesConnie Nelson / Julie Ewy vs Lori Sella-Armstrong / Martha Gove6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRaquel Clasby / Maribel Weitz vs Bridget He / Jules Felsecker6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-22vs 2LIB-MARLEY 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDeana Shields / Raquel Clasby vs Kate Farwell / Thu Kehn3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Cooper / Pardip Bolina vs Kelly Dipilla / Kendra Theriot4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSamina Siddiqui / Maribel Weitz vs Vivian Marley / Hilary Maly6-3, 6-1
2022-10-14vs 1LIB-SAULD 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F2Won 21
L#1 DoublesSamina Siddiqui / Vivien Reece vs Hilary Hayden / Becky Cleason5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Brennan / Sara Chang vs Elissa Bayraktar / Kathleen Flosky7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Cooper / Pardip Bolina vs Sara Vogler / Eira Duran3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJulie Ewy / Marla Booth vs Hanna Song / Lisa Russo3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeana Shields / Vivien Reece vs Barbara Carmack / Kathy Christensen6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPardip Bolina / Connie Nelson vs Marjorie D Alecy / Sharon Nicola6-1, 6-2
2022-10-01vs 3CHIP-SHAW 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F2Won 21
L#1 DoublesVivien Reece / Lori Reece vs Carol Miller / Mary Gregg3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSamina Siddiqui / Pardip Bolina vs Susi Shaw / Cynthia Gur-Arie1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Ewy / Marla Booth vs Donna Lartigue / Sarah Fahrbach2-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings23 teams · WOMEN 75 COMBO SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14HV-SHIELDS 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F28222827239
25SCWB-FARRELL 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F47119515160
33LTF-BARRY 75 DAY WOMEN SEM F17119517155
44PEACH-DEGUZMAN 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F37116819183
51LIB-SAULD 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F27323721237
62FAC-JAM 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F563171024216
71BEV-STRACHAN 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F563151232266
81COURT 4-BRADY 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F35316821189
92DEER-CARLSON 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F453121229223
102LIB-MARLEY 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F255161431260
112DEER-SUTKIEWICZ 75 DAY WOMEN SEM F144141022191
123LTF-NAJAR 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F545121534252
136TRAV-WHITELOCKE 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F24692144303
141BEV-FLYNN 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F435121229224
154BLOOM-BARLOW 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F43591535233
163CHIP-SHAW 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F237121841308
175VTC-CORTINA 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F23782247332
186LTF-MARVEL NELSON 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F42681636253
192EAST-ZAMPARDO 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F32661837239
204TROY-LIVINGSTON 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F527101739283
213PEACH-PARROTT 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F31571124173
224BLOOM-WILLIAMS 75 DAY WOMEN SEM F11732145279
23drop 9.6 0P 756087 SCWB-SHARMA 75 W/E WOMEN000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Heather Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.67
Sara Chang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.65
Raquel Clasby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Pardip Bolina
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Samina Siddiqui
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Maribel Weitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Linda Brennan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Julie Ewy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Deana Shields
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Connie Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Lori Reece
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kathie Seifert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Marla Booth
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Vivien Reece
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maribel Weitz + Linda Brennan3354% games+10.1% vs expected
Raquel Clasby + Vivien Reece5358% games+6.8% vs expected
Kathie Seifert + Linda Brennan9258% games+6.6% vs expected
Raquel Clasby + Sara Chang3251% games+5.9% vs expected
Sara Chang + Linda Brennan2352% games+5.5% vs expected
Raquel Clasby + Pardip Bolina4248% games+2.5% vs expected
Sara Chang + Deana Shields3352% games+2.4% vs expected
Connie Nelson + Lori Reece11138% games+1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heather Cooper
55W–61L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Chang
69W–70L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Raquel Clasby
92W–109L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Pardip Bolina
33W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.62
Samina Siddiqui
44W–77L career · 6 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
Maribel Weitz
90W–81L career · 2 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
Linda Brennan
57W–73L career · 6 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Julie Ewy
85W–74L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Deana Shields
88W–141L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Connie Nelson
35W–78L career · 3 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Lori Reece
71W–148L career · 4 lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.99
Kathie Seifert
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marla Booth
51W–24L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Vivien Reece
49W–32L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.