Teams

5SCWB-FARRELL 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F4

2022 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 75 COMBO SEM

20 players · average NTRP 3.84 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesMaho Hara / Audra Bartholomew vs Allison Foust / Margaret Mowbray7-5, 6-3
2022-12-11vs 4BLOOM-BARLOW 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F4Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHuifang Li / Tsen Joslyn vs Shannon Pierce / Lucia McNally6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRiya Cao / Nury Steiner vs Amy Feldkamp / Mary Marvel-Nelson6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDebbie Hack / Huiping Chen vs Kimberly Blakeslee / Stephanie Gabriel6-4, 6-2
2022-11-13vs 1BEV-FLYNN 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F4Won 20
W#2 DoublesTsen Joslyn / Huifang Li vs Lee Benson / Heather Siersma6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEileen Stein / Suzanne Yu vs Annette Kizy / Hillary Morris7-6, 6-1
2022-11-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesHuifang Li / Jodi Mertz vs Angie Dutkiewicz / Susan Scott4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-10-30vs 4BLOOM-BARLOW 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F4Split 11
L#2 DoublesAlyssa Moss / Audra Bartholomew vs Lucia McNally / Shannon Pierce4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCheryl Lau / Miki Yaguchi vs Maureen Mitchell / Jan Ash6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebbie Hack / Eileen Stein vs Stella Lo / Geri Bulka6-4, 6-2
2022-10-09vs 1BEV-FLYNN 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F4Split 11
L#1 DoublesRiya Cao / Cheryl Lau vs Sarah McCarthy / Heather Siersma4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHuifang Li / Jodi Mertz vs Laurie Mick / Melissa Koos6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings23 teams · WOMEN 75 COMBO SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14HV-SHIELDS 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F28222827239
25SCWB-FARRELL 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F47119515160
33LTF-BARRY 75 DAY WOMEN SEM F17119517155
44PEACH-DEGUZMAN 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F37116819183
51LIB-SAULD 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F27323721237
62FAC-JAM 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F563171024216
71BEV-STRACHAN 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F563151232266
81COURT 4-BRADY 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F35316821189
92DEER-CARLSON 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F453121229223
102LIB-MARLEY 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F255161431260
112DEER-SUTKIEWICZ 75 DAY WOMEN SEM F144141022191
123LTF-NAJAR 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F545121534252
136TRAV-WHITELOCKE 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F24692144303
141BEV-FLYNN 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F435121229224
154BLOOM-BARLOW 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F43591535233
163CHIP-SHAW 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F237121841308
175VTC-CORTINA 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F23782247332
186LTF-MARVEL NELSON 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F42681636253
192EAST-ZAMPARDO 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F32661837239
204TROY-LIVINGSTON 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F527101739283
213PEACH-PARROTT 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F31571124173
224BLOOM-WILLIAMS 75 DAY WOMEN SEM F11732145279
23drop 9.6 0P 756087 SCWB-SHARMA 75 W/E WOMEN000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Aiko Lapinski
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.85
Madoka Minamoto
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.80
Nury Steiner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.77
Cheryl Lau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Akemi Maebashi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Tsen Joslyn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Yumiko Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.60
Debbie Hack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Riya Cao
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Aya King
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.44
Audra Bartholomew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Tammy Watson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.43
Huiping Chen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.31
Elizabeth Cirulis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Alyssa Moss
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Eileen Stein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Huifang Li
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jodi Mertz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Miki Yaguchi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Suzanne Yu
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aya King + Huiping Chen5454% games+13.1% vs expected
Madoka Minamoto + Akemi Maebashi4259% games+11.5% vs expected
Yumiko Farrell + Huiping Chen5155% games+10.0% vs expected
Nury Steiner + Aiko Lapinski8458% games+7.3% vs expected
Debbie Hack + Suzanne Yu5167% games+6.5% vs expected
Yumiko Farrell + Miki Yaguchi4258% games+6.4% vs expected
Huiping Chen + Miki Yaguchi4255% games+6.3% vs expected
Yumiko Farrell + Akemi Maebashi6357% games+6.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aiko Lapinski
152W–92L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Madoka Minamoto
78W–61L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Nury Steiner
185W–151L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Cheryl Lau
144W–124L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Akemi Maebashi
66W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Tsen Joslyn
92W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Yumiko Farrell
195W–151L career · 7 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Debbie Hack
146W–95L career · 2 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Riya Cao
108W–81L career · 2 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Aya King
130W–72L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
4
Audra Bartholomew
112W–125L career · 2 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
Tammy Watson
148W–109L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
4
Huiping Chen
138W–91L career · 5 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Elizabeth Cirulis
108W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Alyssa Moss
138W–70L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Eileen Stein
38W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Huifang Li
51W–9L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jodi Mertz
49W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Miki Yaguchi
130W–41L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Yu
163W–59L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.