Teams

2FAC-JAM 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F5

2022 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 75 COMBO SEM

19 players · average NTRP 3.81 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-17vs 1BEV-STRACHAN 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F5Split 11
W#1 DoublesJoy van Buhler / Chelsea Passmore vs Elise Gross / Laure Housey7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVania White / Luminita Varos vs Kimberly Strachan / Jodi Iacco7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-12-03vs 1BEV-STRACHAN 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChinhuey Chao / Samantha Palazzolo vs Joelle Mansfield / Elise Gross6-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesStephanie Podolsky / Chinhuey Chao vs Kelly Hill / Heather Green0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLuminita Varos / Anne Belleau-Mills vs Jennifer Pawlowski / Michelle Lanesky6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Gonte / Birgit Sorgenfrei vs Julie Boike / Susan Proefke6-4, 7-5
2022-11-12vs 3LTF-NAJAR 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F5Split 11
W#2 DoublesLuminita Varos / Julie Short vs Gwen Daar / Amy Olind6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSamantha Palazzolo / Rebecca Stecker vs Jessica Berkovitz / Alisa Kasprzak3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-30vs 4TROY-LIVINGSTON 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F5Split 11
L#1 DoublesNisha Jam / Anne Belleau-Mills vs Heather Green / Donyel Renaud5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSamantha Palazzolo / Cindy Cole vs Jennifer Pawlowski / Christine Tocco6-1, 6-0
2022-10-16vs 1BEV-STRACHAN 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F5Won 21
W#1 DoublesLuminita Varos / Julie Short vs Cindy Horcoff / Laura Duzan6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMeredith Tipton / Vania White vs Joelle Mansfield / Susan Lesson6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStephanie Podolsky / Rheanon Parrino vs Samantha Ruma / Veronica O'Hara2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNisha Jam / Birgit Sorgenfrei vs Julie Boike / Michelle Lanesky6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChinhuey Chao / Joy van Buhler vs Linda Smith / Susan Proefke6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-10-01vs 3LTF-NAJAR 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMeredith Tipton / Chelsea Passmore vs Susan Hollady / Alisa Kasprzak5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSamantha Palazzolo / Cindy Cole vs Jeannine Lambrecht / Jane Richardson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings23 teams · WOMEN 75 COMBO SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14HV-SHIELDS 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F28222827239
25SCWB-FARRELL 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F47119515160
33LTF-BARRY 75 DAY WOMEN SEM F17119517155
44PEACH-DEGUZMAN 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F37116819183
51LIB-SAULD 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F27323721237
62FAC-JAM 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F563171024216
71BEV-STRACHAN 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F563151232266
81COURT 4-BRADY 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F35316821189
92DEER-CARLSON 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F453121229223
102LIB-MARLEY 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F255161431260
112DEER-SUTKIEWICZ 75 DAY WOMEN SEM F144141022191
123LTF-NAJAR 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F545121534252
136TRAV-WHITELOCKE 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F24692144303
141BEV-FLYNN 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F435121229224
154BLOOM-BARLOW 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F43591535233
163CHIP-SHAW 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F237121841308
175VTC-CORTINA 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F23782247332
186LTF-MARVEL NELSON 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F42681636253
192EAST-ZAMPARDO 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F32661837239
204TROY-LIVINGSTON 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F527101739283
213PEACH-PARROTT 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F31571124173
224BLOOM-WILLIAMS 75 DAY WOMEN SEM F11732145279
23drop 9.6 0P 756087 SCWB-SHARMA 75 W/E WOMEN000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emily Radner
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.97
Nisha Jam
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.95
Meredith Tipton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Chelsea Passmore
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Julie Short
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.85
Amy Gonte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Luminita Varos
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Karen McDiarmid
published 4
3.63
Samantha Palazzolo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Stephanie Podolsky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Rheanon Parrino
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Joy van Buhler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Anne Belleau-Mills
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Birgit Sorgenfrei
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Rebecca Stecker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.27
Vania White
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Chinhuey Chao
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Cindy Cole
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jocelyn Smith
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Short + Chelsea Passmore5064% games+16.1% vs expected
Amy Gonte + Nisha Jam4253% games+5.7% vs expected
Luminita Varos + Anne Belleau-Mills12457% games+4.5% vs expected
Rebecca Stecker + Anne Belleau-Mills8460% games+2.4% vs expected
Luminita Varos + Nisha Jam22859% games+1.8% vs expected
Vania White + Nisha Jam3261% games+1.6% vs expected
Cindy Cole + Chinhuey Chao3259% games+0.3% vs expected
Amy Gonte + Jocelyn Smith3445% games−4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emily Radner
127W–36L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Nisha Jam
136W–73L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Meredith Tipton
141W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Chelsea Passmore
89W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
Julie Short
112W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Amy Gonte
189W–204L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Luminita Varos
109W–70L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Karen McDiarmid
114W–90L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Samantha Palazzolo
119W–105L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Stephanie Podolsky
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Rheanon Parrino
85W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Joy van Buhler
45W–84L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Anne Belleau-Mills
141W–72L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Birgit Sorgenfrei
143W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Rebecca Stecker
140W–108L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Vania White
93W–65L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Chinhuey Chao
47W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cindy Cole
159W–95L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Jocelyn Smith
74W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.