Teams

Sh.Littleton18S

2024 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-15vs Ca.Robayo18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesSydney Chick vs Jessica Phillips6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLeah Curran vs Mariana Lima Gonzalez2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesTraci Crabtree vs Gillian Kelleher1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-13vs Ma.Altneu18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesErin Wynia vs Mallory Altneu5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLeah Curran vs Hannah Boghosian3-6, 0-6
2024-10-09vs Sa.Truitt18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Kelli Williams6-7, 6-7
L#3 SinglesTraci Crabtree vs Erika Peterson3-6, 0-6
2024-09-10vs Na.Rodrigues18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesErin Wynia vs Lindsay Murdock4-6, 1-6
2024-09-03vs Sa.Overholser18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesTraci Crabtree vs Anne Bailey1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesErin Wynia vs Tyler Cunningham6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesLeah Curran vs Holly Camak6-7, 6-7
2024-08-27vs Pa.Hankerson18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesSydney Chick vs Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan6-2, 6-0
2024-08-20vs Ba.Wilhelm18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Barbara Wilhelm7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Julie Dougherty
published
3.55
Sydney Chick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Shannon Littleton
published
3.46
Traci Crabtree
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Erin Wynia
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
Kimberly McLellan
published
3.12
Leah Curran
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Holly Atkinson
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Littleton + Julie Dougherty12957% games+3.2% vs expected
Sydney Chick + Leah Curran4260% gamesnot enough data
Holly Atkinson + Erin Wynia224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Dougherty + Erin Wynia224 matchesnot enough data
Traci Crabtree + Erin Wynia303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Dougherty
49W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Sydney Chick
50W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
Shannon Littleton
38W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Traci Crabtree
183W–103L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Erin Wynia
185W–127L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.39
Kimberly McLellan
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Leah Curran
109W–76L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Holly Atkinson
253W–179L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.