Teams

Ca.Robayo18S

2024 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-05vs Pa.Hankerson18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesLaurene Fitzgerald vs QUEEN HARGROVE6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-20vs Na.Rodrigues18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesLaurene Fitzgerald vs Naomi Rodrigues0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesGillian Kelleher vs Cari DeCandia6-7, 3-6
2024-10-15vs Sh.Littleton18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Leah Curran6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesGillian Kelleher vs Traci Crabtree1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-08vs Sa.Truitt18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesGillian Kelleher vs Erika Peterson0-6, 2-6
2024-10-06vs Ba.Wilhelm18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Elizabeth Short7-5, 6-3
L#3 SinglesCarrie Domnick vs Silpa Yalamanchili5-7, 3-6
2024-08-27vs Ma.Altneu18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Jenna Raynor6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCarrie Domnick vs Rosalyn Hatlen6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-08-20vs Li.Fultz18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarrie Domnick vs Dianna Erwin5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Mariana Lima Gonzalez
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.26
Carrie Domnick
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Carolina Robayo
published 3.5
3.15
Angelica Rose
published 3.5
3.14
Gillian Kelleher
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Laurene Fitzgerald
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
Laura Rendon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolina Robayo + Gillian Kelleher2544% gamesnot enough data
Carolina Robayo + Laurene Fitzgerald1444% gamesnot enough data
Carolina Robayo + Carrie Domnick314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mariana Lima Gonzalez
128W–73L career · 6 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Carrie Domnick
20W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Carolina Robayo
145W–188L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Angelica Rose
9W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Gillian Kelleher
165W–164L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Laurene Fitzgerald
101W–157L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
Laura Rendon
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.