Teams

Li.Fultz18S

2024 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-01vs Sh.Littleton18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesVanese Clough vs Shannon Littleton6-7, 2-6
2024-09-29vs Sa.Overholser18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesDianna Erwin vs Anne Bailey4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesVanese Clough vs Addison Camak4-6, 0-6
2024-09-26vs Na.Rodrigues18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesLisa Fultz vs Anna Kooper2-6, 3-6
2024-09-24vs Sa.Truitt18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesDianna Erwin vs Kelli Williams6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesOlga Stephens vs OLIVIA ROBERSON6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLisa Fultz vs Claire Owens6-3, 7-6
2024-09-03vs Pa.Hankerson18SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesLisa Fultz vs Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesVanese Clough vs QUEEN HARGROVE6-4, 6-1
2024-08-27vs Ba.Wilhelm18SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesOlga Stephens vs Stephanie Charlino7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesVanese Clough vs Barbara Wilhelm6-4, 6-4
2024-08-20vs Ca.Robayo18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesDianna Erwin vs Carrie Domnick7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLisa Fultz vs Angelica Rose2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Lorraine Hall
published
3.46
Dianna Erwin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Olga Stephens
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Vanese Clough
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Lisa Fultz
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Jacqueline Morgan
published
Stefanie Cage
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanese Clough + Dianna Erwin11954% games+1.3% vs expected
Lisa Fultz + Vanese Clough4648% gamesnot enough data
Olga Stephens + Dianna Erwin8266% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Fultz + Olga Stephens8166% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Fultz + Dianna Erwin6263% gamesnot enough data
Olga Stephens + Vanese Clough033 matchesnot enough data
Olga Stephens + Jacqueline Morgan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorraine Hall
50W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.74
3.5
Dianna Erwin
224W–99L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Olga Stephens
231W–106L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Vanese Clough
173W–150L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Lisa Fultz
179W–126L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.18
Jacqueline Morgan
22W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
Stefanie Cage
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.