Teams

Pa.Hankerson18S

2024 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-05vs Ca.Robayo18SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesRoberta Hadley vs Emily Larson2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesQUEEN HARGROVE vs Laurene Fitzgerald0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-18vs Ba.Wilhelm18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesJamiyla Bolton-Cubillan vs Elizabeth Short0-6, 2-6
2024-10-15vs Na.Rodrigues18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesPamela Hankerson vs Anna Kooper3-6, 4-6
2024-10-08vs Sa.Overholser18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesJamiyla Bolton-Cubillan vs Holly Camak2-6, 2-6
2024-09-10vs Ma.Altneu18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesJamiyla Bolton-Cubillan vs Rosalyn Hatlen2-6, 0-6
2024-09-03vs Li.Fultz18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJamiyla Bolton-Cubillan vs Lisa Fultz1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesQUEEN HARGROVE vs Vanese Clough4-6, 1-6
2024-08-27vs Sh.Littleton18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesJamiyla Bolton-Cubillan vs Sydney Chick2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesQUEEN HARGROVE vs Shannon Littleton2-6, 1-6
2024-08-20vs Sa.Truitt18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesPamela Hankerson vs Katie Morrow3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRoberta Hadley vs Erika Peterson0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesQUEEN HARGROVE vs Sandra Truitt6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Paulina Powierza
published
3.39
Roberta Hadley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Pamela Hankerson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Michelle Mills
published
2.83
Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.66
QUEEN HARGROVE
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roberta Hadley + Pamela Hankerson121647% games+9.6% vs expected
QUEEN HARGROVE + Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan0830% games−7.1% vs expected
QUEEN HARGROVE + Pamela Hankerson31338% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Hankerson + Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paulina Powierza
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
3.5
Roberta Hadley
245W–120L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Pamela Hankerson
96W–202L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
Michelle Mills
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
124W–174L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
3
QUEEN HARGROVE
107W–205L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.