Teams

MD.Wade

2025 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-12vs TING.GrasserLost 01
L#2 SinglesKelly Pfrommer vs Julie Newson2-6, 0-6
2025-11-07vs KF.ScagnelliSplit 11
L#2 SinglesJessica Tanaka vs Tara Navarro6-7, 0-6
W#3 SinglesJonay Zies vs Bridgett Murphy6-4, 6-4
2025-10-22Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKatie Klingemann vs Emily Jones4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-08vs TOC.HumphreyWon 10
W#1 SinglesKatie Klingemann vs Callan Fike6-2, 6-1
2025-10-01vs ACP.LipkinSplit 11
L#2 SinglesJonay Zies vs Emily Haverstick0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesKatie Klingemann vs Allison Lagstrom6-3, 6-1
2025-09-24vs TING.WhiteWon 20
W#2 SinglesKatie Klingemann vs Dianna White6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesJessica Tanaka vs Lauren Harbin6-2, 6-4
2025-09-17vs MCP.CaiLost 01
L#2 SinglesKelly Pfrommer vs Yelizaveta Petrova0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Julia Wade
published
2.95
Eva Brent
published
2.94
Katie Klingemann
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.87
Jaime Nolan
published
2.68
Jonay Zies
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.39
Jessica Tanaka
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.31
Kelly Pfrommer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaime Nolan + Katie Klingemann303 matchesnot enough data
Katie Klingemann + Julia Wade213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Wade
30W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
Eva Brent
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Katie Klingemann
96W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jaime Nolan
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
2.5
Jonay Zies
27W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%10%90%
2.68
2.5
Jessica Tanaka
20W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Kelly Pfrommer
27W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.