Teams

TING.Grasser

2025 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-16vs KF.ScagnelliWon 20
W#1 SinglesMolly van Dyne vs Erin Rabbitt6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJulie Newson vs Stephanie Denton7-6, 7-6
2025-11-12vs MD.WadeWon 30
W#1 SinglesMolly van Dyne vs Jaime Nolan6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJulie Newson vs Kelly Pfrommer6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesEmme Parrish vs Amanda Hahn6-0, 6-1
2025-11-05vs TOC.HumphreyWon 20
W#1 SinglesDevon Wadsworth vs Shanie Kpanay6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesEmme Parrish vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-21vs ACP.LipkinWon 20
W#1 SinglesMolly van Dyne vs Priya Desai7-6, 6-4
W#3 SinglesTracy Grasser vs Sarah Rodriguez6-2, 6-4
2025-10-15Won 20
W#2 SinglesEmme Parrish vs Penny Kraft6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesDevon Wadsworth vs Nishi Patel6-2, 6-1
2025-10-07vs TING.WhiteWon 20
W#1 SinglesDevon Wadsworth vs Sarah London6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesEmme Parrish vs Dianna White6-1, 6-4
2025-10-01Split 11
W#1 SinglesMolly van Dyne vs Emily Jones4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJulie Newson vs Kace Martin6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-09-24Won 21
W#1 SinglesDevon Wadsworth vs McKenna Martin6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJulie Newson vs Julianne Cinoman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesEmme Parrish vs Kelly Walton6-3, 6-2
2025-09-17vs BENT.WagnerSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMolly van Dyne vs Molly Schneider4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTracy Grasser vs Lea Ann Baker3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Molly van Dyne
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Devon Wadsworth
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
3.18
Emme Parrish
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.98
Julie Newson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.89
Kristen Henderson
published
2.83
Tracy Grasser
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.69
Kay Jackson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Molly van Dyne
44W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
3
Devon Wadsworth
132W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
3
Emme Parrish
39W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
Julie Newson
70W–78L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Kristen Henderson
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Tracy Grasser
145W–131L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Kay Jackson
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.