Teams

MVCC GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-03vs LTC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteven Hardegen / Chris Vogelsang vs Randy Holstlaw / Steve Caulk6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-03vs LTC SILVERWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Vogelsang / Steven Hardegen vs Chet Paris / Robert Dobbs6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKenton Roeder vs Greg Tilden6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDave Evenson vs Michael Brown7-6, 6-2
2022-05-10vs MC REDLost 01
L#2 SinglesSteven Hardegen vs Brad Arnold6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesSteven Hardegen vs Christopher Mitchell6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-26vs RHCC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Vogelsang / Steven Hardegen vs Scott Mauthe / Mike Schrade6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-19vs NJ NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Hardegen / Patrick Robson vs Carl Roberts / John Bernard1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Chris Vogelsang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Scott Newcomb
published
3.19
Steven Hardegen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Dave Evenson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
John Mullins
published
2.96
Andrew Payne
published 3.5
Daniel Snare
published
Juan Lacayo
published
Kenton Roeder
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Patrick Robson
published
STEVEN MAYS
published
Theodore DeVito
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Vogelsang + Steven Hardegen271057% games+4.2% vs expected
Dave Evenson + John Mullins4453% games+3.8% vs expected
Andrew Payne + Patrick Robson2445% games+2.9% vs expected
Steven Hardegen + Scott Newcomb6849% games+0.5% vs expected
Scott Newcomb + John Mullins1445% games−6.1% vs expected
Dave Evenson + Theodore DeVito3251% games−6.6% vs expected
Dave Evenson + Scott Newcomb4742% games−11.7% vs expected
Dave Evenson + Steven Hardegen314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Vogelsang
98W–31L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
Scott Newcomb
29W–44L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Steven Hardegen
71W–49L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Dave Evenson
43W–35L career · 1 line in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
John Mullins
31W–43L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Andrew Payne
24W–25L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
Daniel Snare
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Juan Lacayo
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kenton Roeder
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Patrick Robson
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
STEVEN MAYS
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Theodore DeVito
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.