Teams

LaMoure - Double Trouble

2024 Howard Columbia Combo · Howard Columbia Combo 7.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.92 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-10-29vs Lee-Der of the PackWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatie Tetrault / Maneesha Ahluwalia vs Angela Parker / Nancy Der6-7, 3-2
2024-10-28vs OaksmithLost 02
L#1 DoublesSanghee Lee / Maneesha Ahluwalia vs Madison Simmons / Leanne Paranik3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy LaMoure / GENA CHUNG vs Gena Conron / Julie Gowin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-27vs MacDonald - MacAttack 7.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesEvelyn Chan / Kim Steffen vs Stephanie Richards / Jean Chaisson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesManeesha Ahluwalia / Linda Tsai vs Sally Christie / Julie Swartz6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy LaMoure / Sung Cho vs Cintya Leveque / Natalie Leveque5-7, 4-6
2024-10-21vs Jenkins - Penn PalsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelsey Forbes / Linda Tsai vs Mary Shawhan / Mary Klett6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy LaMoure / GENA CHUNG vs Lisa Paulman / Sydney Anderson6-1, 6-2
2024-10-17vs OaksmithWon 20
W#2 DoublesAmy LaMoure / Sung Cho vs Jackie Crispell / Anna Williams7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesErin Kim / GENA CHUNG vs Rachael Mott / Elisa Oaksmith6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-12vs Lee-Der of the PackLost 01
L#3 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Sanghee Lee vs Kate Dempsey / Jean Acuna3-6, 4-6
2024-10-09vs MacDonald - MacAttack 7.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesManeesha Ahluwalia / Sung Cho vs Kim Daniels / Jennie Kim4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy LaMoure / Tricia Muneses vs Cintya Leveque / Natalie Leveque7-6, 6-4
2024-10-06vs Jenkins - Penn PalsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKatie Tetrault / Jill Rose vs Karen Keane / Denise Buch6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Tricia Muneses vs Shalen Fairbanks / Valerie Hicks6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2024-09-21vs MacDonald - MacAttack 7.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy LaMoure / Katie Tetrault vs Kim Daniels / Julie Swartz4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJill Rose / GENA CHUNG vs Cintya Leveque / Natalie Leveque3-6, 3-4
2024-09-16vs Jenkins - Penn PalsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Tetrault / Kelsey Forbes vs Mary Klett / Mary Shawhan7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesManeesha Ahluwalia / Maria Cristina Sanchez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-05vs Lee-Der of the PackLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelsey Forbes / Kim Steffen vs Jennifer Lee / Rita Piel3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy LaMoure / Katie Tetrault vs Kate Dempsey / Beyza Akcam2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Linda Tsai vs Angela Parker / Jean Acuna1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jill Rose
published
3.78
Katie Tetrault
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.77
Evelyn Chan
published
3.70
Kim Steffen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Ellen McLaughlin
published
3.62
Tricia Muneses
published
3.54
Maneesha Ahluwalia
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.53
Amy LaMoure
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.50
Sanghee Lee
published
3.35
Linda Tsai
published
3.35
Sung Cho
published
3.29
GENA CHUNG
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.04
Karen Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Rose + Katie Tetrault4164% games+5.2% vs expected
Sanghee Lee + Tricia Muneses4170% games+4.0% vs expected
Maneesha Ahluwalia + Kim Steffen3256% gamesnot enough data
GENA CHUNG + Amy LaMoure2348% gamesnot enough data
Sung Cho + GENA CHUNG044 matchesnot enough data
Sung Cho + Sanghee Lee314 matchesnot enough data
GENA CHUNG + Linda Tsai314 matchesnot enough data
GENA CHUNG + Sanghee Lee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Rose
46W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Katie Tetrault
144W–97L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Evelyn Chan
22W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Kim Steffen
114W–95L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Kelsey Forbes
140W–112L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69
Ellen McLaughlin
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Tricia Muneses
43W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.62
4
Maneesha Ahluwalia
120W–123L career · 5 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Amy LaMoure
172W–214L career · 7 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Sanghee Lee
37W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Linda Tsai
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Sung Cho
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
GENA CHUNG
122W–130L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Maria Cristina Sanchez
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Karen Jones
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.