Teams

1FAC-KAZANJIAN 8.5W COMBO SEM F2

2023 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 85 COMBO SEM

18 players · average NTRP 4.14 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-12-16vs 4LIFE-SZYMANSKI 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Won 21
W#1 DoublesNaoko McKelvey / Heather Enright vs Amy Blackwell / Cathy White6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAlissa VanderKooi / Lora Kazanjian vs Kristen Tessmar / Amy Olind6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPiper Copeland / Erin Robinson vs Rise Gilliland / Deanna Brown3-6, 6-7
2023-12-09vs 2EAST-MONTE 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesNaoko McKelvey / Heather Enright vs Katelyn Andrews / Yolanda Lewczuk6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBarbara Friesen / Rebecca Tanguay vs Ayumi Sasaki / Kate Gavagan2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStacey Lareau / Lora Kazanjian vs McCall Monte / Emily Radner2-6, 0-6
2023-12-02vs 3DEER-DEISINGER 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPiper Copeland / Heather Enright vs Sarah Malys / Anne Bushroe4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesFrances Parsons / Susan Bartelt vs Jennifer Deisinger / Andrea Rachwal6-7, 3-6
2023-11-19Won 21
W#1 DoublesNaoko McKelvey / Heather Enright vs Erin DuFresne / Shannon Croteau6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMiyuki Anderson / Lora Kazanjian vs Mambwe Deen / Holly Machus2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLeimomi Respicio / Rebecca Tanguay vs Kathy Wilson / Leslie Muzzio6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-11-13vs 2EAST-MONTE 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Split 11
L#1 DoublesNaoko McKelvey / Heather Enright vs Jessica Kruczek / Elizabeth Etterbeek5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesFrances Parsons / Stacey Lareau vs Ty Moss / Emily Radner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-11-05vs 3DEER-DEISINGER 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesApril Cour / Naoko McKelvey vs Sarah Malys / Lauren Vosicky6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErin Robinson / Piper Copeland vs Jennifer Deisinger / Anne Bushroe2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Bartelt / Karen Pozolo vs Jori Lewis / Andrea Rachwal1-6, 0-6
2023-11-04vs 2EAST-MONTE 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Won 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Enright / Naoko McKelvey vs Darylann Gulliver / Yolanda Lewczuk6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Tanguay / Barbara Friesen vs Ty Moss / Amy Gonte6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHyacinth Villarin / Nisha Jam vs Claire Baenen / Emily Radner2-6
2023-10-28vs 4LIFE-SZYMANSKI 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Won 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Tanguay / Naoko McKelvey vs Shannon Croteau / Erin DuFresne6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Enright / Erin Robinson vs Cathy White / Cathy Howe4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNisha Jam / April Cour vs Julia Szymanski / Mambwe Deen3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-10-22vs 3DEER-DEISINGER 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLeimomi Respicio / Nisha Jam vs Jennifer Deisinger / Sarah Malys2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStacey Lareau / Frances Parsons vs Angie Dutkiewicz / Andrea Rachwal6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDeborah Siegel / April Cour vs Leslie Schneemann / Colleen Verch4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WOMEN 85 COMBO SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12EAST-MONTE 8.5W COMBO SEM F28121615179
22FAC-STEINER 8.5W COMBO SEM F17218921210
31LIB-SAULD 8.5W COMBO SEM F163171024223
43DEER-DEISINGER 8.5W COMBO SEM F263161128235
53BEV-GESSNER 8.5W COMBO SEM F145131432250
61FAC-KAZANJIAN 8.5W COMBO SEM F245111638274
74CHIP-BENOIT 8.5W COMBO SEM F11862147305
84LIFE-SZYMANSKI 8.5W COMBO SEM F20962143277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Naoko McKelvey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.37
Alissa VanderKooi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Barbara Friesen
published 4.5
4.16
Stacey Lareau
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.97
Nisha Jam
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.95
Deborah Siegel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Frances Parsons
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.92
Erin Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Heather Enright
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
Leimomi Respicio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Rebecca Tanguay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Piper Copeland
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Lora Kazanjian
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Karen Pozolo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
April Cour
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Hyacinth Villarin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Miyuki Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Bartelt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Robinson + Heather Enright19465% games+14.8% vs expected
Alissa VanderKooi + Lora Kazanjian6458% games+11.0% vs expected
Heather Enright + Naoko McKelvey161156% games+2.2% vs expected
Erin Robinson + Lora Kazanjian3351% games+0.5% vs expected
Rebecca Tanguay + Nisha Jam3352% games+0.1% vs expected
Susan Bartelt + Piper Copeland111249% games−1.5% vs expected
Erin Robinson + Piper Copeland3445% games−5.5% vs expected
Naoko McKelvey + Rebecca Tanguay3251% games−6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Naoko McKelvey
174W–82L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Alissa VanderKooi
99W–66L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%85%15%
4.37
4.5
Barbara Friesen
46W–46L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Stacey Lareau
40W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
4.16
4
Nisha Jam
136W–73L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.97
4.5
Deborah Siegel
48W–63L career · 1 line in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.95
4.5
Frances Parsons
94W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.92
4
Erin Robinson
56W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Heather Enright
175W–115L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Leimomi Respicio
26W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Rebecca Tanguay
111W–102L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Piper Copeland
39W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Lora Kazanjian
138W–123L career · 3 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Karen Pozolo
74W–110L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%55%44%
3.48
4
April Cour
40W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.39
Hyacinth Villarin
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Miyuki Anderson
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Susan Bartelt
35W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.