Teams

2EAST-MONTE 8.5W COMBO SEM F2

2023 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 85 COMBO SEM

20 players · average NTRP 4.30 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-12-16vs 3DEER-DEISINGER 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Won 30
W#1 DoublesClaire Baenen / Katelyn Andrews vs Jennifer Deisinger / Michelle Watson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Radner / McCall Monte vs Anne Bushroe / Sarah Malys7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDarylann Gulliver / N Maxine Kennebrew vs Leslie Schneemann / Colleen Verch6-0, 6-1
2023-12-09vs 1FAC-KAZANJIAN 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Won 21
L#1 DoublesKatelyn Andrews / Yolanda Lewczuk vs Naoko McKelvey / Heather Enright3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAyumi Sasaki / Kate Gavagan vs Barbara Friesen / Rebecca Tanguay6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMcCall Monte / Emily Radner vs Stacey Lareau / Lora Kazanjian6-2, 6-0
2023-12-02vs 4LIFE-SZYMANSKI 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Won 30
W#1 DoublesJessica Kruczek / Amy Gonte vs Amy Blackwell / Laure Housey2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarcia Varner / McCall Monte vs Rise Gilliland / Laurie Dunn6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTy Moss / Samantha Wagner vs Myrna Harbar / Deanna Brown7-6, 6-4
2023-11-13vs 1FAC-KAZANJIAN 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Won 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Kruczek / Elizabeth Etterbeek vs Naoko McKelvey / Heather Enright7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesYahsha Moore / Kate Gavagan vs Barbara Friesen / Nisha Jam6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTy Moss / Emily Radner vs Frances Parsons / Stacey Lareau3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-11-04vs 1FAC-KAZANJIAN 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDarylann Gulliver / Yolanda Lewczuk vs Heather Enright / Naoko McKelvey2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTy Moss / Amy Gonte vs Rebecca Tanguay / Barbara Friesen7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesClaire Baenen / Emily Radner vs Hyacinth Villarin / Nisha Jam6-2
2023-11-03vs 4LIFE-SZYMANSKI 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Won 30
W#1 DoublesKatelyn Andrews / N Maxine Kennebrew vs Luciana Imamura Amendola / Kathy Wilson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAyumi Sasaki / Kate Gavagan vs Cathy White / Julia Szymanski6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarcia Varner / Jessica Kruczek vs Myrna Harbar / Holly Machus6-2, 6-4
2023-10-28vs 3DEER-DEISINGER 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Won 30
W#1 DoublesKatelyn Andrews / Claire Baenen vs Jennifer Deisinger / Andrea Rachwal6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTy Moss / N Maxine Kennebrew vs Anne Bushroe / Michelle Watson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Etterbeek / Samantha Wagner vs Angie Dutkiewicz / Nikole Carlson6-1, 6-2
2023-10-14vs 4LIFE-SZYMANSKI 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Won 21
W#1 DoublesClaire Baenen / Katelyn Blumberg vs Erin DuFresne / Shannon Croteau6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAyumi Sasaki / Marinda Coetzee vs Luciana Imamura Amendola / Kathy Wilson4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTy Moss / Emily Radner vs Eleanore Stration / Robin Inscho3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-10-07vs 3DEER-DEISINGER 8.5W COMBO SEM F2Won 21
W#1 DoublesDarylann Gulliver / Elizabeth Etterbeek vs Nikole Carlson / Lauren Vosicky6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTy Moss / Amy Gonte vs Jennifer Deisinger / Sarah Malys7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesClaire Baenen / Emily Radner vs Susan Joseph / Anne Bushroe7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WOMEN 85 COMBO SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12EAST-MONTE 8.5W COMBO SEM F28121615179
22FAC-STEINER 8.5W COMBO SEM F17218921210
31LIB-SAULD 8.5W COMBO SEM F163171024223
43DEER-DEISINGER 8.5W COMBO SEM F263161128235
53BEV-GESSNER 8.5W COMBO SEM F145131432250
61FAC-KAZANJIAN 8.5W COMBO SEM F245111638274
74CHIP-BENOIT 8.5W COMBO SEM F11862147305
84LIFE-SZYMANSKI 8.5W COMBO SEM F20962143277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Ayumi Sasaki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Darylann Gulliver
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.40
Katelyn Blumberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.33
McCall Monte
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Emily Radner
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
4.15
Katelyn Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Samantha Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Jessica Kruczek
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.98
Ty Moss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.90
Kate Gavagan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Amy Gonte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Elizabeth Etterbeek
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Yolanda Lewczuk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Marcia Varner
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.49
Claire Baenen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Jocelyn Smith
published
Kim Pelc
published
Marinda Coetzee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
N Maxine Kennebrew
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Yahsha Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ty Moss + Samantha Wagner9163% games+17.5% vs expected
Katelyn Andrews + Darylann Gulliver5081% games+14.0% vs expected
Claire Baenen + Emily Radner24169% games+9.4% vs expected
Ty Moss + McCall Monte11657% games+7.7% vs expected
Jessica Kruczek + Darylann Gulliver5066% games+6.7% vs expected
N Maxine Kennebrew + Katelyn Blumberg12856% games+6.5% vs expected
Jessica Kruczek + Katelyn Andrews3252% games+6.1% vs expected
Samantha Wagner + McCall Monte6163% games+6.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Ayumi Sasaki
71W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
4.80
5
Darylann Gulliver
47W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Katelyn Blumberg
53W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
McCall Monte
176W–80L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Emily Radner
127W–36L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
Katelyn Andrews
60W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
4.15
Samantha Wagner
77W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
4.13
Jessica Kruczek
85W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.08
Ty Moss
217W–128L career · 6 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Kate Gavagan
62W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Amy Gonte
189W–204L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Elizabeth Etterbeek
9W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Yolanda Lewczuk
88W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Marcia Varner
209W–140L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Claire Baenen
136W–103L career · 5 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
Jocelyn Smith
74W–59L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Pelc
95W–42L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marinda Coetzee
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
N Maxine Kennebrew
41W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Yahsha Moore
19W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.