Teams

1LIB-SAULD 8.5W COMBO SEM F1

2023 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 85 COMBO SEM

18 players · average NTRP 4.27 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-12-09Lost 03
L#1 DoublesZana Kwaiser / Hilary Hayden vs Elena Strakhova / Chelsea Passmore6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily McAbier / Christina Slade vs Alison Kirschenbaum / Kimberly Nylen5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMeredith Moore / Molly Lipham vs Kelly Smith / Nury Steiner3-6, 4-6
2023-12-02vs 3BEV-GESSNER 8.5W COMBO SEM F1Won 30
W#1 DoublesHilary Hayden / Zana Kwaiser vs Olivia Underwood / Stephanie Snell6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNori Flautner / Meredith Moore vs Emily Gessner / Christina Endrud6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCamie Messick / Frances Carlson vs Stephanie Davis / Kimberly Strachan6-3, 6-3
2023-11-26vs 3BEV-GESSNER 8.5W COMBO SEM F1Won 30
W#1 DoublesZana Kwaiser / Hilary Hayden vs Lauren Rakolta / Olivia Underwood6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEmily McAbier / Christina Slade vs Emily Gessner / Sali Refka6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeather Vogt / Frances Carlson vs Stephanie Davis / Megan Josifovski3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-11-18vs 4CHIP-BENOIT 8.5W COMBO SEM F1Won 21
W#1 DoublesHilary Hayden / Zana Kwaiser vs Mary-Shea Rozsypal / Silvia Kleer6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCamie Messick / Frances Carlson vs Ruedee Vance / Robin Parker6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMeredith Moore / Bettina Briceno-Abreu vs Hannah Pianko / Kristin Stein6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-11-11vs 2FAC-STEINER 8.5W COMBO SEM F1Won 21
W#1 DoublesHilary Hayden / Zana Kwaiser vs Elena Strakhova / Huiping Chen7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristina Slade / Emily McAbier vs Alison Kirschenbaum / Kate Farwell4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Vogt / Frances Carlson vs Akemi Maebashi / Mie Tashiro6-1, 6-3
2023-10-28vs 4CHIP-BENOIT 8.5W COMBO SEM F1Won 30
W#1 DoublesEmily McAbier / Nori Flautner vs Mary-Shea Rozsypal / Sarah Fahrbach6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCamie Messick / Ashley Mooney vs Robin Parker / Ruedee Vance7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeather Vogt / Eira Duran vs Deb Goist / Janet Palmer6-3, 6-1
2023-10-22Lost 12
W#1 DoublesZana Kwaiser / Molly Lipham vs Carly Eckert / Kimberly Nylen2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Vogt / Ashley Mooney vs Elena Strakhova / Chelsea Passmore2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMeredith Moore / Eira Duran vs Kelly Smith / Aiko Lapinski4-6, 5-7
2023-10-15vs 3BEV-GESSNER 8.5W COMBO SEM F1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Vogt / Ashley Mooney vs Heather Tallinger / Kimberly Strachan1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Sauld / Madeline Slade vs Angela Wachowicz / Kristy Korth4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMolly Lipham / Bettina Briceno-Abreu vs Emily Gessner / Lauren Rakolta6-7, 2-6
2023-10-06vs 4CHIP-BENOIT 8.5W COMBO SEM F1Won 30
W#1 DoublesZana Kwaiser / Hilary Hayden vs Mary-Shea Rozsypal / Ruedee Vance6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCamie Messick / Eira Duran vs Silvia Kleer / Faith Sparr6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKusull Kim / Christina Slade vs Sarah Fahrbach / Deb Goist6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WOMEN 85 COMBO SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12EAST-MONTE 8.5W COMBO SEM F28121615179
22FAC-STEINER 8.5W COMBO SEM F17218921210
31LIB-SAULD 8.5W COMBO SEM F163171024223
43DEER-DEISINGER 8.5W COMBO SEM F263161128235
53BEV-GESSNER 8.5W COMBO SEM F145131432250
61FAC-KAZANJIAN 8.5W COMBO SEM F245111638274
74CHIP-BENOIT 8.5W COMBO SEM F11862147305
84LIFE-SZYMANSKI 8.5W COMBO SEM F20962143277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Camie Messick
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 5
Heather Vogt
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.43
Meredith Moore
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.40
Zana Kwaiser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.29
Emily McAbier
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.14
Hilary Hayden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Jennifer Sauld
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Madeline Slade
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Christina Slade
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
Bettina Briceno-Abreu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Frances Carlson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.72
Laura LeVasseur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Ashley Mooney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Megan Etheridge
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.48
Molly Lipham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Eira Duran
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4
Kusull Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nori Flautner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frances Carlson + Ashley Mooney5065% games+10.8% vs expected
Zana Kwaiser + Emily McAbier10363% games+10.2% vs expected
Hilary Hayden + Kusull Kim17366% games+7.7% vs expected
Jennifer Sauld + Christina Slade12460% games+5.8% vs expected
Megan Etheridge + Ashley Mooney4163% games+5.6% vs expected
Christina Slade + Megan Etheridge4257% games+5.4% vs expected
Madeline Slade + Christina Slade16167% games+5.1% vs expected
Kusull Kim + Christina Slade5253% games+4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Camie Messick
29W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Heather Vogt
65W–25L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Meredith Moore
80W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
4.43
5
Zana Kwaiser
54W–28L career · 7 lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
4.40
4.5
Emily McAbier
86W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Hilary Hayden
368W–207L career · 9 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
4.14
4
Jennifer Sauld
118W–52L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Madeline Slade
36W–10L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Christina Slade
245W–103L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Bettina Briceno-Abreu
76W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Frances Carlson
144W–64L career · 7 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Laura LeVasseur
122W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Ashley Mooney
128W–34L career · 6 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Megan Etheridge
147W–55L career · 6 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Molly Lipham
88W–86L career · 3 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
4
Eira Duran
148W–66L career · 11 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
Kusull Kim
92W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Nori Flautner
37W–7L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.