Teams

Ossman/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 4.5 Women - Monday AM

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-11vs Vaughan/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 SinglesLoralie Liggett vs JESSICA ARNOLD2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPalina Beck / PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO vs Lindsey Vaughan / Amanda Poole7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCaroline Lancaster vs Mia Pretorius4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-21vs Vaughan/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Kennedy / PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO vs Stacy Baskin / Brittney Covington3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSydney Combs vs JESSICA ARNOLD1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPalina Beck / Stephanie Feyes vs Jeanai Kluge / Callie Bartz7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Palina Beck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.30
PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.24
Caroline Lancaster
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
4.06
Stephanie Feyes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Kathleen Carbonari
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Debra Hutjens
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.82
Cindy Mccullough
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Brenda Ossman
published 4
3.74
Janet Adamson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Loralie Liggett
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.68
Lavanya Nagineni
published
3.67
Kelly Horna
published
3.44
Sydney Combs
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Mccullough + Kathleen Carbonari19364% games+5.4% vs expected
Palina Beck + Stephanie Feyes4164% gamesnot enough data
Palina Beck + PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO123 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Lancaster + Janet Adamson213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Horna + Janet Adamson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Palina Beck
20W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
4.37
PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO
5W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4
Caroline Lancaster
16W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%4%96%
4.24
Stephanie Feyes
34W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
Kathleen Carbonari
54W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.06
4
Debra Hutjens
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.91
4
Cindy Mccullough
39W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Brenda Ossman
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Adamson
28W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Loralie Liggett
19W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Lavanya Nagineni
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Kelly Horna
19W–21L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Sydney Combs
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.