Teams

Vaughan/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 4.5 Women - Monday AM

11 players · average NTRP 4.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-18vs Thomas/Blevins/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesAmanda Poole / Jessica Largen vs Michelle Egly / Michelle Reyzer6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLindsey Vaughan vs Jamie Weiss1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie Cuicchi / Jeanai Kluge vs Sarah Gedney / Gretchen Olson6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMia Pretorius vs Ella S.6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMacKenzie Phillips / Rachel Howie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-11vs Ossman/NashvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Erickson / Callie Bartz vs Amanda Kennedy / Sarah Green7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLindsey Vaughan / Amanda Poole vs Palina Beck / PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMia Pretorius vs Caroline Lancaster6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNatalie Cuicchi / MacKenzie Phillips vs Kathleen Carbonari / Cindy Mccullough7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-04vs Snodgrass/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesCallie Bartz / Jessica Largen vs Marybeth Snodgrass / Lindsay Manifold6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLindsey Vaughan vs Lindsay Brown6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Erickson / Brittney Covington vs Charlsey Graham / Emily Shapland6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMia Pretorius vs Ashley Spirrison3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJESSICA ARNOLD / Rachel Howie vs Taylor Shelton / Thashia Garcia6-2, 6-7
2024-10-28vs Thomas/Blevins/NashvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesBrittney Covington / Stacy Baskin vs Ella S. / Mary Claiborne Sharpe6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNatalie Cuicchi / Jeanai Kluge vs Michelle Reyzer / Lynn Butler6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMia Pretorius vs Andrea Arkava6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCallie Bartz / Jennifer Stephens vs Mary Glenn Powell / Murn Roberts6-1, 6-0
2024-10-21vs Ossman/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesStacy Baskin / Brittney Covington vs Amanda Kennedy / PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeanai Kluge / Callie Bartz vs Palina Beck / Stephanie Feyes5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMia Pretorius vs Debra Hutjens6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Stephens / Lindsey Vaughan vs Janet Adamson / Sarah Green4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-14vs Snodgrass/NashvilleWon 31
L#1 DoublesLindsey Vaughan / Natalie Cuicchi vs Taylor Shelton / Thashia Garcia1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrittney Covington / Jeanai Kluge vs Charlsey Graham / Veronica Allen6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesStacy Baskin vs Molly Murphy2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Erickson / Amanda Poole vs Michelle Salada / Emily Shapland6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 4.5 Women - Monday AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Vaughan/Nashville60201024213
2Kirkland/Shulman/Nashville51191125245
3Robinson/Nashville42171332263
4Snodgrass/Nashville24141639293
5Snap/Whitley/Nashville24111944312
6Flynn/Saliba/Nashville15131737287
7Thomas/Blevins/Nashville15111941278

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.92
Amanda Poole
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.65
Rachel Howie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.40
Callie Bartz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.34
Brittney Covington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Lindsey Vaughan
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.01
Jeanai Kluge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Stacy Baskin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jessica Largen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
MacKenzie Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mia Pretorius
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Natalie Cuicchi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brittney Covington + Stacy Baskin404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amanda Poole
21W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.92
Rachel Howie
59W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.65
4.5
Callie Bartz
16W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.40
4.5
Brittney Covington
18W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
4.34
Lindsey Vaughan
19W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
4.28
Jeanai Kluge
23W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.01
Stacy Baskin
18W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Jessica Largen
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
MacKenzie Phillips
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mia Pretorius
4W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Cuicchi
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.